Skip to main content

PLAGIARISMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM- Jamie Peters

 According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word plagiarism means "the action or practice of taking someone else's work, idea, etc., and passing it off as one's own; literary theft" (OED). Look, I know that the idea of property rights was a much more flexible theory back then, but COME ON. In the excerpt from Cicero's writings, the character of Scipio says, "If the state chooses its ruler by haphazard, it will be as easily upset as a vessel, if you chose a pilot by lots from the passengers" (7). In the writing world, it is one thing to take what someone says and restate it in your own words, and to a certain extent, that can be permissible. If, however, you choose to blatantly copy over someone's work, at least use different metaphors!

Okay, I'm done being silly! In all honesty, I think that Cicero used The Republic in the exact way that it was supposed to be used. Plato's work was not published so that he could receive praise, no matter how backwards that seems for that time period. Plato wanted the masses to be brought out of the cave of ignorance even though the light could burn. Cicero recognized this hard truth, and, through his own dialogue, he practically applied Plato's teaching to the real world. overall, it is really cool to see that even though Cicero was a defender of the Roman Republic, he could still see the pros and cons of the different forms of government, just like Plato wanted people to.


"Plagiarism." Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 2020. 

    https://www-oed-com.umobile.idm.oclc.org/view/Entry/144939?redirectedFrom=plagiarism#eid

(See, Cicero? THIS IS HOW YOU CITE A SOURCE)


Comments

  1. I think it is interesting how we read that line and instantly think about plagiarism. Plagiarism is a concept that is ingrained into our heads from day one. We are trained to know and fear it. I believe that Cicero was not plagiarizing because Sophocles probably spoke those words in public. Plato probably did not write “The Republic” until later. Because ideas were most commonly spread through word of mouth, I am sure it was not uncommon for scholars to paraphrase other scholars’ work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Cicero using Plato's work is pretty ironic considering that Rome as a nation itself adopted many of ancient Greece's qualities and mythologies. A religion with greek-like deities, a spartan-like hunger, a necessity, for war; how did Rome receive credit for anything they portrayed in stories at all? Seems to be all derived from something else entirely *cough* Greece *cough*.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...