Skip to main content

Pride...Good or Bad?- Jamie Peters

The main thing I want to talk about today is one quote from this week's reading: "Pride, then, seems to be a sort of crown of the virtues; for it makes them greater, and it is not found without them" (Aristotle 38). The word pride is a trigger word for most Christians. In the Renaissance Period, it was considered tot worst of the Seven Deadly Sins. In Biblical terms, pride was almost always the downfall of great leaders, like Samson (jeez), King Nebuchadnezzar, and Moses. It is almost like pride is completely abolished in the Bible in favor of the other virtues because of its volatility and unbalanced nature. 

And yet, just as Aristotle says, pride really is the crowning virtue of Christianity. Our pride, however, is not placed in our own accomplishments like the Ancient Greeks. Our pride is placed in the fact that we know where our allegiance is. Additionally, the pride we feel in being in the fold of Jesus is widely proclaimed like the gossip of Aristotle's rules. We are, however, able to walk confidently, or slow, as he puts it (39) and we are able to put our time and effort into beautiful yet fruitless things as long as it serves the purpose of boosting Jesus' greatness. Somehow, the pride of a Christian is simultaneously the complete opposite and eerily similar to Aristotle's idea of the virtue of Pride. What do you guys think?


I commented on Abbie's and Hailey Morgan's posts.

Comments

  1. Lily CaswellOctober 26, 2020 at 10:29 PM

    Amen, sister! I think Christians sometimes switch the terms pride and boastfulness. We are called to boast in Christ but not boast about ourselves and our accomplishments.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Braylan StringfellowOctober 26, 2020 at 10:36 PM

    Pride is a tricky subject to talk about because there is so many forms of pride. The type of pride most of us think about is the bad kinds. However there is some things to be proud about like the fact that you are a Christian or what God has done. Pride is bad when it focuses on ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rachael GregsonOctober 27, 2020 at 12:20 AM

    I think for something to be considered 'good' or 'bad', in this case we're talking pride, two things should be taken into deep thought. One is the amount. Like Aristotle's golden mean, things should not be excessive, nor should they be insufficient. Secondly, the source of the pride should be tracked down to its root, and the intentions behind it laid bare. Because intentions will always tell everything.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more