Skip to main content

Pride...Good or Bad?- Jamie Peters

The main thing I want to talk about today is one quote from this week's reading: "Pride, then, seems to be a sort of crown of the virtues; for it makes them greater, and it is not found without them" (Aristotle 38). The word pride is a trigger word for most Christians. In the Renaissance Period, it was considered tot worst of the Seven Deadly Sins. In Biblical terms, pride was almost always the downfall of great leaders, like Samson (jeez), King Nebuchadnezzar, and Moses. It is almost like pride is completely abolished in the Bible in favor of the other virtues because of its volatility and unbalanced nature. 

And yet, just as Aristotle says, pride really is the crowning virtue of Christianity. Our pride, however, is not placed in our own accomplishments like the Ancient Greeks. Our pride is placed in the fact that we know where our allegiance is. Additionally, the pride we feel in being in the fold of Jesus is widely proclaimed like the gossip of Aristotle's rules. We are, however, able to walk confidently, or slow, as he puts it (39) and we are able to put our time and effort into beautiful yet fruitless things as long as it serves the purpose of boosting Jesus' greatness. Somehow, the pride of a Christian is simultaneously the complete opposite and eerily similar to Aristotle's idea of the virtue of Pride. What do you guys think?


I commented on Abbie's and Hailey Morgan's posts.

Comments

  1. Amen, sister! I think Christians sometimes switch the terms pride and boastfulness. We are called to boast in Christ but not boast about ourselves and our accomplishments.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pride is a tricky subject to talk about because there is so many forms of pride. The type of pride most of us think about is the bad kinds. However there is some things to be proud about like the fact that you are a Christian or what God has done. Pride is bad when it focuses on ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think for something to be considered 'good' or 'bad', in this case we're talking pride, two things should be taken into deep thought. One is the amount. Like Aristotle's golden mean, things should not be excessive, nor should they be insufficient. Secondly, the source of the pride should be tracked down to its root, and the intentions behind it laid bare. Because intentions will always tell everything.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...