Skip to main content

The Modern Day "Proud Man" // Jessef Leslie

In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle speaks of the proud man, a person who finds a balance between being “vain” and “unduly humble” through temperance. This person does so not by how much he achieves, but by finding in his actions the “mean in respect of the rightness of them; for he claims what is accordance with his merits, while the others go to excess or fall short.” (Aristotle 38). So, this person does not undermine his abilities nor exaggerate them; He seeks not rewards of endless wealth nor denies all accommodations and merit due to a belief that he is not valuable enough for them. The humble man can seem “disdainful” at times because he “cares not to be praised nor for others to be blamed; nor is he given to praise.” (Aristotle 39). The humble man also takes his time, he has a “slow step” and “a level of utterance” as he tries to understand things and keep his excitement from dying while not letting it control him.

            On the other hand, in modern day society, most people seem to be unduly humble. This also seems to be the most virtuous of the three for us. The issue with being so humble is that it leads to a negative outlook on one’s self. These perspectives of an individual lead them to failure, self-harm, depression, and much more. We constantly joke about ourselves yet will not joke in such a way about kind stranger or a good friend. It is ironic how much we love the people around us yet do not share the same love for the body and mind we are living inside of. While an arrogant attitude on the opposite end is annoying, at least it influences the person to pursuit his/ her goals and potentially learn how to cool off later down the line. 

        I believe that as a community we should speak of our achievements an accomplishments a bit more. If we boost each other’s achievements and have a more positive outlook on ourselves, it will lead to a more positive community. There’s no issue with laughing at ourselves, but the key is to find the balance between that and boasting to reach a point where we understand our value and can gladly say what we are capable of.

Commented on Ian Blair's and Hailey Morgan's Posts.


Comments

  1. IsabelleOctober 27, 2020 at 8:17 AM

    I like your post! It seems like the proud man states the facts rather than the opinions. There is a fine line between being humble and being self-deprecating. The person you described in your second paragraph seemed to lean towards to latter. You're correct in that we need to reach the healthy balance of knowing who we are but not being arrogant about our abilities.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more