Skip to main content

The Prideful Man—Lily Caswell

 “Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” (Proverbs 16:18, KJV)

Aristotle said that a man who is proud of himself thinks that he is worthy of great things. However, this does not mean that we shouldn’t have ambition and set goals for ourselves. Aristotle said that pride is concerned with certain great things like honor and goodness, since he thinks that he deserves the most. “Pride... seems to be a sort of crown of the virtues; for it makes them greater, and it is not found without them.” (Aristotle, Book 4, Section 3, par. 3) It seems to me that Aristotle thought that pride seems to exaggerate the good qualities. That also would most likely mean that pride exaggerates the bad qualities as well, kind of like the super soldier serum that Steve Rogers was injected with. It makes the good man better and the bad man worse. Pride does the same thing; it amplifies the good and bad qualities. 


I commented on Jamie’s and Clabo’s posts.

Comments

  1. Love your post! I thought of the same verse while I was reading book four. Aristotle confirmed that pride cometh before the fall. I love the connection you made to Captain America. I wonder if the ancient philosophers would agree he is a just and virtuous man.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...