Skip to main content

The Split in the Road+ A Reference to The Office-Rachael Gregson



 Reading Aristotle's writings and how he defined the difference between magnanimity and pusillanimity, I immediately pictured a road splitting off into two in my head. In life, we've all come to a crossroad before, probably like a thousand times if you're me, and each time a choice demands to be made.  

The meaning of magnanimity is "greatness of soul". A person of this virtue chases after things in life that are considered honorable and respectable.

The meaning of pusillanimity is "smallness of soul". In comparison to the magnanimous individual, one who is pusillanimous turns away from noble duties because he fears what is asked of him and instead settles on whichever's the easiest path of the two. He smiles to himself as he walks away, not understanding that almost always the easier path will lead to the hardest lessons in life until there's no point in turning around. 

I think a possible thing Aristotle could have been getting at is that pusillanimous people will never know their own qualification in life because they never give themselves a chance to be tested through fire. The troublesome thing is, they think they're thriving when rather, they're just merely surviving. They'll never fail, but they'll never ever really achieve success either. 

Hate to be the nerd to bring The Office into this, but it reminded me of a quote that Michael Scott said in one of the episodes, "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take." Being pusillanimous is exactly that.

I commented on posts by Jamie Peters and Abbie Hedden.

Comments

  1. Hailey MorganOctober 26, 2020 at 9:35 AM

    I find it ironic how, in Honors, it should be fairly easy to speak up and be magnanimous. However, I tend to stay extremely quiet in Honors, choosing to instead remain on the pusillanimous path.

    This is a habit I really need to break out of! Our Honors class is probably the best place to practice being magnanimous so I really need to remove myself from my comfort zone and dive into our discussions more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abigale BellOctober 26, 2020 at 6:47 PM

    Hi Rachael! Your post reminded me so much of one of my favorite poems, 'The Road Not Taken,' by Robert Frost. Maybe the magnanimous road is the road less travelled; maybe it's harder. But this road leads to "greatness of soul" which will make all the difference in life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Logan TurnerOctober 26, 2020 at 8:42 PM

    Yeah, I try to be a humble person, but I often find myself just being pusillanimous. It's definitely something I need to work on. In my effort to be moderately magnanimous, I find myself shying away too far from being conceited into pusillanimous territory which as we as we all know, is a problem.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more