Skip to main content

Creative Writing 101 with Virgil and Homer // Abigale Bell


As I was reading Virgil's Aneid, I couldn't help but compare the story to the Iliad. Here we have two great epics that recount the actions of the gods and the actions of humans in relation to the gods. I was interested to see the differences in how the authors depicted their gods. Instead of focusing on the details of the story itself, I took a step back and looked at the big picture.

One of the main differences I noticed between Virgil's and Homer's works is the style of storytelling. Homer throws the reader right into the action of the story. One is immediately caught up in the middle of the events. There seemed to be a presupposition that Homer's readers would know the background of the story. Virgil's writing is different. In the Aeneid, the reader is not immediately thrown into the middle of the story, instead, they are led into it by an introduction of sorts. This introduction gives the reader a window into the background of the story, but it also builds the stage for the main character who comes in to tell the story from his perspective. 

Something else I noticed when considering the Aeneid in light of the Iliad, was the difference in the voices of the authors. Homer's account of the gods and their involvement with humans was very dramatic. He describes scenes so magnificently that the reader (or listener) is not able to experience the story. Virgil takes a milder approach in his descriptive language of the gods, but he is very realistic when describing events. He tells the story like great fiction as if the listener could actually be in the moment experiencing what the character experiences. 

Commented on Hailey's and Jamie's posts.

Comments

  1. Abigail, I though it was interesting how Virgil kind of led up to the events in the Aeneid. It’s like he assumed his audience wouldn’t have been familiar with the major events in the Iliad and just did a basic review of them. I also noticed the difference about Homer and Virgil talking about the gods and maybe that’s a representation of their cultures. The Roman gods were very much not involved in the every day life of Romans while the Greek gods were everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Something I found interesting as well was the invocation of the muse. The Greek poets did it at the beginning of almost all their stories. The Illiad calls the muse in the first line, but Virgil begins the Aneid by saying "I sing..." and waits several lines before saying his invocation, as though he does it out of obligation rather than a true belief in divine inspiration.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...