Skip to main content

Creative Writing 101 with Virgil and Homer // Abigale Bell


As I was reading Virgil's Aneid, I couldn't help but compare the story to the Iliad. Here we have two great epics that recount the actions of the gods and the actions of humans in relation to the gods. I was interested to see the differences in how the authors depicted their gods. Instead of focusing on the details of the story itself, I took a step back and looked at the big picture.

One of the main differences I noticed between Virgil's and Homer's works is the style of storytelling. Homer throws the reader right into the action of the story. One is immediately caught up in the middle of the events. There seemed to be a presupposition that Homer's readers would know the background of the story. Virgil's writing is different. In the Aeneid, the reader is not immediately thrown into the middle of the story, instead, they are led into it by an introduction of sorts. This introduction gives the reader a window into the background of the story, but it also builds the stage for the main character who comes in to tell the story from his perspective. 

Something else I noticed when considering the Aeneid in light of the Iliad, was the difference in the voices of the authors. Homer's account of the gods and their involvement with humans was very dramatic. He describes scenes so magnificently that the reader (or listener) is not able to experience the story. Virgil takes a milder approach in his descriptive language of the gods, but he is very realistic when describing events. He tells the story like great fiction as if the listener could actually be in the moment experiencing what the character experiences. 

Commented on Hailey's and Jamie's posts.

Comments

  1. Abigail, I though it was interesting how Virgil kind of led up to the events in the Aeneid. It’s like he assumed his audience wouldn’t have been familiar with the major events in the Iliad and just did a basic review of them. I also noticed the difference about Homer and Virgil talking about the gods and maybe that’s a representation of their cultures. The Roman gods were very much not involved in the every day life of Romans while the Greek gods were everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Something I found interesting as well was the invocation of the muse. The Greek poets did it at the beginning of almost all their stories. The Illiad calls the muse in the first line, but Virgil begins the Aneid by saying "I sing..." and waits several lines before saying his invocation, as though he does it out of obligation rather than a true belief in divine inspiration.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...