Skip to main content

Highway to Heartbreak // Abigale Bell

 


The Romans had a very structured idea of what the underworld looked like. It seems that for them, the cause of death and honor of the body played a major role in determining one's eternal destination. There are separate places for the souls of different people. Their locations seem to progress (digress? since we're in the underworld) in order of how noble the Romans saw the death. First, Aeneas encounters the crowds of those who were not given a proper burial. They are doomed to be stranded on the other side of the river Styx until their bodies are buried. This is the least noble way to die; no recognition; no honor. Next encountered, are the souls of children, those condemned by judge and jury, and those who commit suicide. Past this place, are the Fields of Mourning where wander the souls of those whose passionate love was rejected. Here, Aeneas encounters Dido. 

I find it intriguing that Aeneas does not find Dido in the place for those souls who took their own lives. Instead, he finds her in the Fields of Mourning where "...here are those whom pitiless love consumed/ With cruel wasting, hidden on paths apart..." (Virgil, 596). She seems to be breaking the rules. The souls here are doomed to spend eternity alone; to continue to live in love which cannot be returned. It seems that the Romans saw death by one's own hand to be less noble than death by someone else's. Maybe this leads to the idea that they didn't consider Dido's death to be a suicide. Could it have been a murder, indirectly, by Aeneas' hand? Or maybe Dido's passionate love for Aeneas, which ended in heartbreak, overshadowed the circumstances surrounding her death. 


Commented on Isabelle's and Kaitlyn's posts.

Comments

  1. I think that in her mind, Dido was killed by Aeneas. Remember that although she purposefully stabbed herself, it was with Aeneas's sword (4.898-899). I think that it mattered a lot what their thoughts on their honor was as they died; Agamemnon is also listed as one of the fallen warriors alongside the Trojans who had died (6.658).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not only was Dido found in the fields of mourning, but so too was her husband. His appearance in this area is still a mystery to me as his love did not go unrequited. In fact, if Dido is now in the fields with him, then shouldn’t this man be placed elsewhere? It’s not like he’s still being adequately “punished” anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love this post! I did not even think about this. It is so interesting. Her husband is also in the Fields of Mourning so Dido is able to turn to him, so she's to truly spending eternity alone. I think Dido should have ended up in the place for those who commit suicide for that is what she did. However, she does do it in a very "Juliet-like" way so I can see how her passion for Aeneas might overshadow her death.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...