Skip to main content

Highway to Heartbreak // Abigale Bell

 


The Romans had a very structured idea of what the underworld looked like. It seems that for them, the cause of death and honor of the body played a major role in determining one's eternal destination. There are separate places for the souls of different people. Their locations seem to progress (digress? since we're in the underworld) in order of how noble the Romans saw the death. First, Aeneas encounters the crowds of those who were not given a proper burial. They are doomed to be stranded on the other side of the river Styx until their bodies are buried. This is the least noble way to die; no recognition; no honor. Next encountered, are the souls of children, those condemned by judge and jury, and those who commit suicide. Past this place, are the Fields of Mourning where wander the souls of those whose passionate love was rejected. Here, Aeneas encounters Dido. 

I find it intriguing that Aeneas does not find Dido in the place for those souls who took their own lives. Instead, he finds her in the Fields of Mourning where "...here are those whom pitiless love consumed/ With cruel wasting, hidden on paths apart..." (Virgil, 596). She seems to be breaking the rules. The souls here are doomed to spend eternity alone; to continue to live in love which cannot be returned. It seems that the Romans saw death by one's own hand to be less noble than death by someone else's. Maybe this leads to the idea that they didn't consider Dido's death to be a suicide. Could it have been a murder, indirectly, by Aeneas' hand? Or maybe Dido's passionate love for Aeneas, which ended in heartbreak, overshadowed the circumstances surrounding her death. 


Commented on Isabelle's and Kaitlyn's posts.

Comments

  1. Jamie PetersNovember 16, 2020 at 10:08 PM

    I think that in her mind, Dido was killed by Aeneas. Remember that although she purposefully stabbed herself, it was with Aeneas's sword (4.898-899). I think that it mattered a lot what their thoughts on their honor was as they died; Agamemnon is also listed as one of the fallen warriors alongside the Trojans who had died (6.658).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hailey MorganNovember 17, 2020 at 12:24 AM

    Not only was Dido found in the fields of mourning, but so too was her husband. His appearance in this area is still a mystery to me as his love did not go unrequited. In fact, if Dido is now in the fields with him, then shouldn’t this man be placed elsewhere? It’s not like he’s still being adequately “punished” anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Haylee LyndNovember 17, 2020 at 8:29 AM

    I love this post! I did not even think about this. It is so interesting. Her husband is also in the Fields of Mourning so Dido is able to turn to him, so she's to truly spending eternity alone. I think Dido should have ended up in the place for those who commit suicide for that is what she did. However, she does do it in a very "Juliet-like" way so I can see how her passion for Aeneas might overshadow her death.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more