Skip to main content

Rome in Birmingham // Abigale Bell

 In Livy's History of Rome, we are brought into the middle of a struggle for equal rights. We have two classes of people; upper and lower; Patricians and Plebeians. These are people with different cultural heritages; one pure, one not so much (according to the upper class). The lower class rises up against injustice and demands equality with the higher class. Haven't we heard this somewhere before? 

Reading this passage from Livy's History of Rome, I am reminded of a letter written by Matin Luther King Jr. from his Birmingham jail cell in 1963. In the midst of the civil rights movement we see people of different races coming against each other in a battle for equality. King had come to Birmingham to advocate for civil rights by peacefully protesting when he was arrested. He wrote a letter to the clergymen of the Birmingham community in response to their outrage at his stirring up trouble. In his letter, King outlines the correct way to approach injustice. He begins by outlining the injustice he sees; calling out the brutality and ugliness of segregation and what it meant for people to experience it. King goes on to address the concerns the clergymen brought up against him. He explains his actions in light of their accusations and tears down their arguments with truth. 

This is very similar to what happened in Rome. The Plebeians fought against the injustice of their segregation form the Patricians. They addressed every unjust argument against them with truth and logic; tearing down the prejudice against them. The Plebeians demanded their right to full citizenship (by intermarriage) just as King demanded full rights to citizenship. 


Commented on Isabelle's and Caroline's posts.

Comments

  1. Yes yes yes!!! I love your post! It's so amazing how history repeats itself. I love the history of an oppressed people rising up, so your connection of the plebeians to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is fantastic! Something that isn't mentioned as much when we study the Civil Rights Movement: interracial marriage. Did you know Alabama was the last state to declare it "legal"? Amazing post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...