Skip to main content

Scattered to the Winds // Ian Blair

Man, what an opening story, and I don't mean that lightly. Aeneas' recollection of the night the city of Troy was practically deleted from existence and burned off the map is pretty keen considering the adrenaline that must have been coursing through his veins. I want to bring your attention to a particular example of symbolism that I couldn't help noticing: The way that Priam's life ends is eerily similar to the way his City falls. Whenever King Priam is confronting Pyrrhus about killing his son Polites, Priam is enraged and angry at the killer, but is too weak to actually fight back or do anything against his aggressor. It becomes evident pretty quickly that this is the case: 
"With this, To the altar step itself he dragged him trembling, Slipping in the pooled blood of his son, And took him by the hair with his left hand. The sword flashed in his right; up to the hilt He thrust it in his body." (Virgil, 52). 
Priam's death would have been swept into the currents of history without much rumor as to what became of him if Aeneas did not witness the event and remember it so vividly. I feel like the Achaeans also wished for the death of Troy, the legend as well as the city, to die off the same way. No legacy, no lasting memory or proof of ever having been built in the first place. The tactic of the Argives' combined forces was to humiliate their enemies one final time; to make the last story of Troy one of great genius by the Achaeans as a way to boast that they were superior in every way. Killing Priam in front of his family insults his ability to defend himself and the trojan people, which stains the legacy of Priam's reign as time moves forward; it's simply how history works.

p.s. I commented on Jamie's and Micah's posts.

Comments

  1. Logan TurnerNovember 12, 2020 at 8:29 AM

    You make a good point. I never really made the connection between Priam's death and the death of the city. As they say, history is written by the victor, and I feel like the Greeks wanted the world to know of Troy's humiliating defeat, that is why we know so much of the destruction of the city.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more