Skip to main content

Scattered to the Winds // Ian Blair

Man, what an opening story, and I don't mean that lightly. Aeneas' recollection of the night the city of Troy was practically deleted from existence and burned off the map is pretty keen considering the adrenaline that must have been coursing through his veins. I want to bring your attention to a particular example of symbolism that I couldn't help noticing: The way that Priam's life ends is eerily similar to the way his City falls. Whenever King Priam is confronting Pyrrhus about killing his son Polites, Priam is enraged and angry at the killer, but is too weak to actually fight back or do anything against his aggressor. It becomes evident pretty quickly that this is the case: 
"With this, To the altar step itself he dragged him trembling, Slipping in the pooled blood of his son, And took him by the hair with his left hand. The sword flashed in his right; up to the hilt He thrust it in his body." (Virgil, 52). 
Priam's death would have been swept into the currents of history without much rumor as to what became of him if Aeneas did not witness the event and remember it so vividly. I feel like the Achaeans also wished for the death of Troy, the legend as well as the city, to die off the same way. No legacy, no lasting memory or proof of ever having been built in the first place. The tactic of the Argives' combined forces was to humiliate their enemies one final time; to make the last story of Troy one of great genius by the Achaeans as a way to boast that they were superior in every way. Killing Priam in front of his family insults his ability to defend himself and the trojan people, which stains the legacy of Priam's reign as time moves forward; it's simply how history works.

p.s. I commented on Jamie's and Micah's posts.

Comments

  1. You make a good point. I never really made the connection between Priam's death and the death of the city. As they say, history is written by the victor, and I feel like the Greeks wanted the world to know of Troy's humiliating defeat, that is why we know so much of the destruction of the city.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...