Skip to main content

The Biggest Tragedy of All Time- Jamie Peters

 Ask anyone that knows me: I do not actively look for, listen to, or obsess over the romantic genre. I will admit (Caroline) that I do like these kinds of things once someone shows them to me, like Pride and Prejudice or The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society. I think the appeal for me in these genres lies in the non-romantic areas of the story, like EVERY SINGLE TIME Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth exchange insults, or the tragic undertones of the fate of poor Elizabeth Maugery in Guernsey. Lucky for me, the "romance" of Dido and Aeneas have both of these lovely aspects!

After hearing the apology of Aeneas for accidentally leading her on, Dido delivers simultaneously the most heartbreaking line and the sickest burn to the most bewildered man:

                "Go, / Go after Italy on the sailing winds, 

                Look for your kingdom, cross the deepsea swell! 

                If divine justice counts for anything, 

                I hope and pray that on some grinding reef 

                Midway at sea you'll drink your punishment 

                And call and call on Dido's name!" (4.526-532).

Through the manipulation of the gods, the unbalanced yoke of love between Dido and Aeneas chokes Dido's mind, heart, and soul. Aeneas has only ever tried to do what the Fates have decreed for him to do, and he believed that the blessing of the gods was upon their union. Now that the façade has been lifted, Dido cannot handle the rejection of a lover that was never hers, and she kills herself. I love the stories of Pride and Prejudice and Guernsey because, despite of their troubles, the love felt between the characters conquers all. The destruction of Dido proves that without love, there is nothing.

I commented on Abbie's and Abigale's posts.

Comments

  1. You really don’t, Jamie. I will also agree with you that Dido’s line is an awesome burn towards Aeneas. To be fair to Aeneas though, Venus was totally setting him up to fail. One does not simply mess up Juno’s plans and expect the rest to be smooth sailing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...