Skip to main content

Spoiler Alert! // Ian Blair

 Roman mythology overall seems to have been set up as a solid mythical world with all types of stories that could be told in the world's setting. However, this does not exclude the fact that by including predestination in describing the nature of the soul, poets like Homer and Virgil have royally screwed themselves out of creating any suspense about the outcome of the hero's journey. Let me explain in further detail; in Book VI of The Aeneid, Aeneas' journey throughout the underworld highlights a specific passage that just blatantly reveals Aeneas' future descendants:

"Turn your two eyes This way and see this people, your own Romans. Here is Caesar, and all the line of Iulus, All who shall one day pass under the dome Of the great sky: this is the man, this one, Of whom you have heard the promise, Caesar Augustus, son of the deified, Who shall bring once again an Age of Gold To Latium. . . Numa, the king, Who will build early Rome on a base of laws . . . After him Comes Tullus, breaker of his country's peace . . ." (Virgil 187-188).

I hate to expose my cinemasins fandom like this, but isn't revealing the lineage of Aeneas to the reader, along with confirming that some souls are "fated" to enter the physical life again (Virgil 186) the number one thing a storyteller does NOT want to do? I mean, how entertaining would it be if Darth Vader was revealed to be Luke's father before The Empire Strikes Back first hit theaters? It would rob audiences of virtually the most iconic plot twist in history, and deeply sour the reputation of later movies in the franchise. I understand wanting to keep continuity with Homer and other poets like him who set up this mythological world, but I can only hope that Virgil's redraft of The Aeneid would not have included this letdown of a moment in the plot line. 


p.s. I commented on Caroline's and Rachael's posts.

Comments

  1. Braylan StringfellowNovember 16, 2020 at 9:07 PM

    I agree that Virgil could have done a better job at this. No one likes spoiler alerts and Virgil basically did one in his own book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jessef LeslieNovember 17, 2020 at 4:24 PM

    I agree and for the Romans it seems that “fate” was not always set in stone. So his destiny isn't a full spoil because it can be altered by the gods. Also, the end of this story was known by the Romans already and was therefore less of a spoiler.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more