Skip to main content

Spoiler Alert! // Ian Blair

 Roman mythology overall seems to have been set up as a solid mythical world with all types of stories that could be told in the world's setting. However, this does not exclude the fact that by including predestination in describing the nature of the soul, poets like Homer and Virgil have royally screwed themselves out of creating any suspense about the outcome of the hero's journey. Let me explain in further detail; in Book VI of The Aeneid, Aeneas' journey throughout the underworld highlights a specific passage that just blatantly reveals Aeneas' future descendants:

"Turn your two eyes This way and see this people, your own Romans. Here is Caesar, and all the line of Iulus, All who shall one day pass under the dome Of the great sky: this is the man, this one, Of whom you have heard the promise, Caesar Augustus, son of the deified, Who shall bring once again an Age of Gold To Latium. . . Numa, the king, Who will build early Rome on a base of laws . . . After him Comes Tullus, breaker of his country's peace . . ." (Virgil 187-188).

I hate to expose my cinemasins fandom like this, but isn't revealing the lineage of Aeneas to the reader, along with confirming that some souls are "fated" to enter the physical life again (Virgil 186) the number one thing a storyteller does NOT want to do? I mean, how entertaining would it be if Darth Vader was revealed to be Luke's father before The Empire Strikes Back first hit theaters? It would rob audiences of virtually the most iconic plot twist in history, and deeply sour the reputation of later movies in the franchise. I understand wanting to keep continuity with Homer and other poets like him who set up this mythological world, but I can only hope that Virgil's redraft of The Aeneid would not have included this letdown of a moment in the plot line. 


p.s. I commented on Caroline's and Rachael's posts.

Comments

  1. Braylan StringfellowNovember 16, 2020 at 9:07 PM

    I agree that Virgil could have done a better job at this. No one likes spoiler alerts and Virgil basically did one in his own book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jessef LeslieNovember 17, 2020 at 4:24 PM

    I agree and for the Romans it seems that “fate” was not always set in stone. So his destiny isn't a full spoil because it can be altered by the gods. Also, the end of this story was known by the Romans already and was therefore less of a spoiler.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more