Skip to main content

Spoiler Alert! // Ian Blair

 Roman mythology overall seems to have been set up as a solid mythical world with all types of stories that could be told in the world's setting. However, this does not exclude the fact that by including predestination in describing the nature of the soul, poets like Homer and Virgil have royally screwed themselves out of creating any suspense about the outcome of the hero's journey. Let me explain in further detail; in Book VI of The Aeneid, Aeneas' journey throughout the underworld highlights a specific passage that just blatantly reveals Aeneas' future descendants:

"Turn your two eyes This way and see this people, your own Romans. Here is Caesar, and all the line of Iulus, All who shall one day pass under the dome Of the great sky: this is the man, this one, Of whom you have heard the promise, Caesar Augustus, son of the deified, Who shall bring once again an Age of Gold To Latium. . . Numa, the king, Who will build early Rome on a base of laws . . . After him Comes Tullus, breaker of his country's peace . . ." (Virgil 187-188).

I hate to expose my cinemasins fandom like this, but isn't revealing the lineage of Aeneas to the reader, along with confirming that some souls are "fated" to enter the physical life again (Virgil 186) the number one thing a storyteller does NOT want to do? I mean, how entertaining would it be if Darth Vader was revealed to be Luke's father before The Empire Strikes Back first hit theaters? It would rob audiences of virtually the most iconic plot twist in history, and deeply sour the reputation of later movies in the franchise. I understand wanting to keep continuity with Homer and other poets like him who set up this mythological world, but I can only hope that Virgil's redraft of The Aeneid would not have included this letdown of a moment in the plot line. 


p.s. I commented on Caroline's and Rachael's posts.

Comments

  1. Braylan StringfellowNovember 16, 2020 at 9:07 PM

    I agree that Virgil could have done a better job at this. No one likes spoiler alerts and Virgil basically did one in his own book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jessef LeslieNovember 17, 2020 at 4:24 PM

    I agree and for the Romans it seems that “fate” was not always set in stone. So his destiny isn't a full spoil because it can be altered by the gods. Also, the end of this story was known by the Romans already and was therefore less of a spoiler.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...
4 comments
Read more

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more