Skip to main content

The Issue with Fate // Jessef Leslie

 

In the Oxford Dictionary, “fate” is defined as “the things, especially bad things, that will happen or have happened to somebody/something” and these things “cannot be stopped or changed”. In The Iliad and in The Aeneid fate is constantly altered by the gods. Aeneas is distracted, by love for Dido, from his destiny and rumors spread of how he has become a “prisoner of lust.” (Virgil 102).  King Iarbas receives the news and compares Aeneas to “Sir Paris” (103). Aeneas’ destiny is to find Italy and build up Rome, though if this is his destiny, it is strange that he can "waste days" and find a new "fate" entirely. Eventually though, Mercury persuades Aeneas to leave Dido and go searching for Italy. Mercury refers to Aeneas' love as “…wasting your days in Libya” (Virgil 105) and urges him to find Rome for “the future, his honor, and his heir, Ascanius”. Aeneas “burned” to leave Carthage and continue his journey, just like Dido did... too soon? Most people can relate to this strange, burning urge that Aeneas felt and Virgil explains it as the gods' “admonition and commands”.

In comparison, Achilles also is distracted form his fate in The Iliad, he leaves the battle at Troy through jealousy and rage. The idea that fate is like a bullseye on a dartboard seems to be a common theme. Both protagonists, Achilles and Aeneas stray away from their destinies that should be inevitable, and are led back to them through coincidence or the intervention of gods. If fate is something that can be missed, then I do not see why we should call it fate in the first place. The word prophecy/prediction would be a better term to explain how they can miss the mark due to love, rage, or other powerful emotions.


Comments: Haylee Lynd and Ian Blair

Comments

  1. IsabelleNovember 17, 2020 at 7:34 AM

    Hey Jessef! Your post is very thought-provoking.! I like your eloquent overview of the reading. However, I'm not sure that fate is missed. The "heroes" are temporarily distracted- as you said of Aeneas- from their course by meddling gods. When one god alters the course, another god comes in to redirect it. But, you are right in that fate can be stopped, even if only for a moment. Great post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more