Skip to main content

Honesty Is The Best Policy...But With A Filter ////// Isabelle Ferguson

 “I need not tell all this to you, my God, but in your presence, I tell it to my own kind, to those other men, however few, who may perhaps pick up this book” (Augustine, page 45). 

This is from the second chapter of Confessions when Augustine is only beginning to tell all of his sins. Based on this quote, Augustine knew his book would be read by others. Still, he showed no regret in telling all of his misdeeds, and- despite the scorn he may have received from his community- Augustine published a book containing every sin he could remember from his lifetime.

I hate to be the person who brings up Hamilton in every conversation, but I can’t help but to see a parallel in Augustine’s Confessions with The Reynold's Pamphlet. Alexander Hamilton wrote out- in fine detail- his acts of adultery against his wife. He went on to publish the pamphlet and even give a copy to every person in Congress. Like Augustine, Hamilton aired his crooked ways to everyone in his community to read. 

Personally, I don’t even like to talk about a disagreement I had with my mother over cheesecake. Augustine and Hamilton took honesty to a completely different level. But why did each man publish something so personal? Anyone who has seen or listened to Hamilton knows that Alexander was trying to remove the taint of a rumor on his name. Based on what I read from the first two chapters of Confessions, Augustine is setting an example. In providing his readers with what is, essentially, a prayer journal, Augustine displays the honest relationship that can be formed with God. Since Christianity was relatively new and developing (Diversification of Practice, page 17), Augustine's Confessions set a great standard for talking to God.


P.S. I commented on Lily Caswell's post and Logan Turner's post!

Comments

  1. It's almost as if these men decided to confront the issues and confess before anyone could use rumors or accusations against them. This is obviously a difficult thing to do, it is also risky, but it is very respectable in my eyes.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...