Skip to main content

Honesty Is The Best Policy...But With A Filter ////// Isabelle Ferguson

 “I need not tell all this to you, my God, but in your presence, I tell it to my own kind, to those other men, however few, who may perhaps pick up this book” (Augustine, page 45). 

This is from the second chapter of Confessions when Augustine is only beginning to tell all of his sins. Based on this quote, Augustine knew his book would be read by others. Still, he showed no regret in telling all of his misdeeds, and- despite the scorn he may have received from his community- Augustine published a book containing every sin he could remember from his lifetime.

I hate to be the person who brings up Hamilton in every conversation, but I can’t help but to see a parallel in Augustine’s Confessions with The Reynold's Pamphlet. Alexander Hamilton wrote out- in fine detail- his acts of adultery against his wife. He went on to publish the pamphlet and even give a copy to every person in Congress. Like Augustine, Hamilton aired his crooked ways to everyone in his community to read. 

Personally, I don’t even like to talk about a disagreement I had with my mother over cheesecake. Augustine and Hamilton took honesty to a completely different level. But why did each man publish something so personal? Anyone who has seen or listened to Hamilton knows that Alexander was trying to remove the taint of a rumor on his name. Based on what I read from the first two chapters of Confessions, Augustine is setting an example. In providing his readers with what is, essentially, a prayer journal, Augustine displays the honest relationship that can be formed with God. Since Christianity was relatively new and developing (Diversification of Practice, page 17), Augustine's Confessions set a great standard for talking to God.


P.S. I commented on Lily Caswell's post and Logan Turner's post!

Comments

  1. It's almost as if these men decided to confront the issues and confess before anyone could use rumors or accusations against them. This is obviously a difficult thing to do, it is also risky, but it is very respectable in my eyes.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...