Skip to main content

The Pear Tree Dilemma//Haylee Lynd

     

 Augustine robs a pear tree, but not because he wants the pears. One may ask, and Augustine does ask, what's that about? Augustine robs the pear tree, not for the need nor the want of the material possession of the pears, but because of the pleasure which he finds in the sin. He says, "Our real pleasure consisted in doing something that was forbidden" (Augustine 47). From Augustine's writings, it appears that humans are naturally evil. Humans desire to sin. They possess a rebellious nature. On the other hand, Desmond Tutu, among others, would argue that humans are naturally good. However, I believe Augustine is right; humans are naturally evil, meaning they have a tendency to sin. In Romans 7:18 Paul writes, "For I know that nothing goods lives in me, that is, in my flesh. For the desire to do what is good is with me, but there is no ability to do it." Even if man desires to do good, he tends to do evil; he has a tendency to sin. I see it this way, when man was created, sin had not yet entered the world. Man had the choice to either obey God or disobey God, but there was no tendency to do either. Man simply had free will. When sin entered the world, man began to exist in a fallen state, corrupted by sin. This is commonly referred to as depravity. However, Jesus came to reconcile and redemption us from that fallen state. Once one becomes a believer, once they believe the Jesus came to save and accept Him as their savior, they once again have full free will as they are given the power over sin which the Spirit gives. 

When Augustine robs the pear tree, he is unsaved. He gives into his rebellious nature. His flesh is in control. He does not seek evil or the consequences which come from it, but he find joy in committing the evil, simply because it is evil. He struggles to resist the temptation to do this, even though he neither needs nor wants the pears. He has better ones at home. He is living in the fallen state. He does not have the power to overcome sin and temptation because he is without God. 


P.S. I commented on Kaitlyn Terry's and Brooke's posts.

Comments

  1. I think humans and Christians especially naturally tend to listen to their body because even though some Christians have grown up in church, we all have that inherent sin nature that we can never really kick. And even non-Christians sometimes have a sense of guilt after committing a sin. We’re all guilty of sometimes committing sin just because we can but we have been given the option should we so choose to ask God for help and His forgiveness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think this dilemma largely comes from us as humans being unable to resist temptation. Try as we might, we are all guilty of something, not the least of which is doing something to see if we can get away with it. I believe that largely comes as a consequence of the original sin

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...