Skip to main content

The Pear Tree Dilemma//Haylee Lynd

     

 Augustine robs a pear tree, but not because he wants the pears. One may ask, and Augustine does ask, what's that about? Augustine robs the pear tree, not for the need nor the want of the material possession of the pears, but because of the pleasure which he finds in the sin. He says, "Our real pleasure consisted in doing something that was forbidden" (Augustine 47). From Augustine's writings, it appears that humans are naturally evil. Humans desire to sin. They possess a rebellious nature. On the other hand, Desmond Tutu, among others, would argue that humans are naturally good. However, I believe Augustine is right; humans are naturally evil, meaning they have a tendency to sin. In Romans 7:18 Paul writes, "For I know that nothing goods lives in me, that is, in my flesh. For the desire to do what is good is with me, but there is no ability to do it." Even if man desires to do good, he tends to do evil; he has a tendency to sin. I see it this way, when man was created, sin had not yet entered the world. Man had the choice to either obey God or disobey God, but there was no tendency to do either. Man simply had free will. When sin entered the world, man began to exist in a fallen state, corrupted by sin. This is commonly referred to as depravity. However, Jesus came to reconcile and redemption us from that fallen state. Once one becomes a believer, once they believe the Jesus came to save and accept Him as their savior, they once again have full free will as they are given the power over sin which the Spirit gives. 

When Augustine robs the pear tree, he is unsaved. He gives into his rebellious nature. His flesh is in control. He does not seek evil or the consequences which come from it, but he find joy in committing the evil, simply because it is evil. He struggles to resist the temptation to do this, even though he neither needs nor wants the pears. He has better ones at home. He is living in the fallen state. He does not have the power to overcome sin and temptation because he is without God. 


P.S. I commented on Kaitlyn Terry's and Brooke's posts.

Comments

  1. I think humans and Christians especially naturally tend to listen to their body because even though some Christians have grown up in church, we all have that inherent sin nature that we can never really kick. And even non-Christians sometimes have a sense of guilt after committing a sin. We’re all guilty of sometimes committing sin just because we can but we have been given the option should we so choose to ask God for help and His forgiveness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think this dilemma largely comes from us as humans being unable to resist temptation. Try as we might, we are all guilty of something, not the least of which is doing something to see if we can get away with it. I believe that largely comes as a consequence of the original sin

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Welcome to Honors! (Please Read This)

     Welcome to Honors! My name is Abbie Hedden and I serve as President of Honors. Jamie Peters is our Vice President, and Caroline Tucker is our Secretary. I look forward to getting to know all of you in class during this upcoming year! There are a few things you need to know about Honors.      There are no quizzes or tests in Honors. Grades are provided based on attendance/class participation, blogs, explication papers, and the research paper. The papers will be addressed at a later date, as they aren't due until later in the semester. However, there is a blog post due every week. Bearing that in mind, here are the requirements! Criteria Blog posts are due Monday at 11:59PM , and comments are due Tuesday at 9:29AM . DO NOT BE LATE ON ASSIGNMENTS. Points WILL be deducted from late assignments! Be sure to have your name in your Blogger profile Blog posts should include at least one to two paragraphs on that week’s reading assignment.  Blog posts shoul...

Topsy Turvy Day—Lily Caswell

  I cannot remember how old I was when I watched T he Hunchback of Notre Dame  but I was at least 8 or 9. I didn’t realize until probably a couple of years ago that the song  “Topsy Turvy” and the corresponding event was actually based on a real festival. The Feast of Fools was usually held on January 1 though it could have also been held on the 6 th  or the 13 th  of January. It was portrayed as a parody of Catholic feasts. Church bells were rung improperly, songs were sung out of tune, and the celebrants “wore strange garments and masks, and used puddings, sausages, and old shoes as censers.” (Seaton, p 77) In the song “Topsy Turvy”, it says “It’s the day the devil in us gets released / It’s the day we mock the prig and shock the priest / Everything is Topsy Turvy at the Feast of Fools… And it’s the day we do the things that we deplore ‘ On the other three hundred and sixty-four.”  I commented on Haylee Lynd’s and Jamie’s posts. Sources: https://www.brita...