Skip to main content

What is Your Music About?- Jamie Peters

        I recently had a conversation with a friend, Lydia Walker, discussing various opinions on Contemporary Christian worship. In my friend's mind, CCM (Christian Contemporary Music, I'm not spelling it out every time) is focused exclusively on modern discipleship, appealing to new Christians by constantly focusing on the redemption received through salvation. Granted, discipleship is one of the most fundamental doctrines of Christianity; Jesus explicitly tells us "Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit" (Mt 28:19 HCSB). The message of modern songs, however, often oversimplify Christianity to appeal to a "new age". Although the repetitive actions of songs such as "Surrounded" by Michael W. Smith provide a good reminder of the protection of Christ, it does little to remind us of God's autonomy outside of our own problems, thus reducing the message of Jesus to, in Lydia's words, 'Christian baby food'.

      Part of the root of this problem is that CCM often abandons the second part of the Great Commission,  "...teaching them to observe everything I have commanded you..." (Mt 28:20a HCSB). Part of what this commandment entails is having lyrics deeply entrenched in the Words of God (The Bible, people). I find it incredibly inspiring that the Christians of old recognized this fact and developed responsive readings and songs out of the traditions of Judaism. The example given of Psalms 136 in the article is a representation of the power of repetition and praise done right, both detailing the power of God and the source of his power, his "steadfast love". There can be much said for and against both CCM and traditional music practices, but no one can deny the power of praising God in any form!

The Bible. Holman Christian Standard Bible, Holman Bible Publishers, 2009.

I commented on Brooke's and Braylan's posts.

Comments

  1. Most of the time, the mainstream music we listen to is what we love because everyone else loves it too, but as you said, that as well takes away from the song is trying to tell us. It strays away from the meaning of who God is alone and people search for that song in need instead of God. Worship is one of the many ways to praise God and give him thanks, but we have to do it in reminder of who He is and why we love him so much. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I cannot stress the amount of times I have sat in church and listened to the worship team do the chorus or bridge of a song repeatedly for probably 4-5 times and thought “Can they get to the end?” And I’ve done it before and I think it will always be something I have to guard against. Usually, the songs that the worship team does it in are with new and modern contemporary songs. I’ll always prefer the older traditional hymns simply because I feel that they cut through the “Christian baby food” and get to the real meat of who Jesus was and is, what He came to do, and what He still does in our lives. I’m not saying I don’t like certain contemporary songs but as a whole, I prefer the hymns and to each his/her own.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...