Skip to main content

What Should Worship Look Like? ~ Emmett Bryant

 Ever since the establishment of the Church there has always been the question, "What should worship look like?". Whether it be meditative worship, voice-led worship, or instrumental worship, there has always been the argument of what constitutes worship. I think we have to understand that all things were created by God and for God, including music. Music is another one of God's tools to speak to us and interact with us. Worship was used all throughout the Old Testament to soothe the soul and influence emotions. With that in mind, I must critique St. Augustine for thinking that being moved by the music used for worship is a sin. The people who use their talents to worship the Lord through voice or instrument are using those avenues to worship just as equally as we, the crowd, are using our voices to worship. It is nonsense to think that finding pleasure or beauty in the worship of a brother or sister to be a sin. Worship is not a static, emotionless action but a vibrant one. Worship is meant to move the heart and bring us into communion with God. Worship is most absolutely meant to be a form of knowing God which is why Paul told the Church to admonish each other with "psalms and hymns and spiritual songs" (Eph. 5:19, ESV). Worship is a place for our heart to deeply commune with God and is meant to be charged with emotions that are in line with the Scriptures. Contrary to fundamentalist thought, worship was never meant to be and never will be, a dry, liturgical exercise. 

I commented on Braylan Stringfellow's post and Madalyn Dillard's post. 

Comments

  1. Abigale BellJanuary 25, 2021 at 6:00 PM

    Hi Emmett! I really enjoyed reading your post! You made a very good point when you spoke of music as a beautiful thing created by God. I think it is important to remember that our worship doesn't originate within ourselves. I also think it is important to understand that worship can become simply a liturgical experience if we do not keep our focus on growing closer to and glorifying God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more