Skip to main content

What Should Worship Look Like? ~ Emmett Bryant

 Ever since the establishment of the Church there has always been the question, "What should worship look like?". Whether it be meditative worship, voice-led worship, or instrumental worship, there has always been the argument of what constitutes worship. I think we have to understand that all things were created by God and for God, including music. Music is another one of God's tools to speak to us and interact with us. Worship was used all throughout the Old Testament to soothe the soul and influence emotions. With that in mind, I must critique St. Augustine for thinking that being moved by the music used for worship is a sin. The people who use their talents to worship the Lord through voice or instrument are using those avenues to worship just as equally as we, the crowd, are using our voices to worship. It is nonsense to think that finding pleasure or beauty in the worship of a brother or sister to be a sin. Worship is not a static, emotionless action but a vibrant one. Worship is meant to move the heart and bring us into communion with God. Worship is most absolutely meant to be a form of knowing God which is why Paul told the Church to admonish each other with "psalms and hymns and spiritual songs" (Eph. 5:19, ESV). Worship is a place for our heart to deeply commune with God and is meant to be charged with emotions that are in line with the Scriptures. Contrary to fundamentalist thought, worship was never meant to be and never will be, a dry, liturgical exercise. 

I commented on Braylan Stringfellow's post and Madalyn Dillard's post. 

Comments

  1. Hi Emmett! I really enjoyed reading your post! You made a very good point when you spoke of music as a beautiful thing created by God. I think it is important to remember that our worship doesn't originate within ourselves. I also think it is important to understand that worship can become simply a liturgical experience if we do not keep our focus on growing closer to and glorifying God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...