Skip to main content

A Good King ~ Madalyn Dillard

     In the beginning lines of Beowulf, the story begins with an orphan boy, Shield Sheafon, who became king. Sheafon conquered many tribes and gained treasures by having the conquered lands pay him tribute. Even though Shield's army is loyal to him, Sheafon does not leave them unaccounted for. Sheild makes sure that his army is protected as well as financed. With every load of tribute Shield would get, the king would always make sure his warriors had a piece of the wealth. This encourages the warriors to do more heroic things for their community and for the king. The author of Beowulf makes sure the readers know that Shield was a good king by literally saying, "That was one good king" (11). 

    Even though the story of this good king is not the main story at hand, I wanted to write about it since I believe this is an important topic to talk about. America does not have kings, but we do have leaders. I just wanted to bring up this question. If the author of Beowulf were to classify our different leaders and politicians, what word would he use? I am not a very political person; however, I am very curious about other's perspectives. With all of the ridiculousness going on, I wonder how a good king would handle it. Of course, kings from the time of Beowulf and leaders in modern times have very different roles and powers, but that does not change the idea that we can have leaders like Shield in Beowulf. 


I commented on Emma Kate and Haylee Lynd's posts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more