Skip to main content

Baby Christians vs Me

I have always been envious of those new to the Christian faith, because they get the joy of discovering how wondrous a life with God is and how their old life was sub-par. Having grown up in a Christian home, I've never really questioned my faith, but simply accepted it as truth because it was what I had grown up with. I think having the ability to evaluate Christianity from the outside is invaluable, as it invokes a spiritual awakening that then drives that person to seek more. Augustine was blessed with such perspective as he transitioned out of Manichaeism into a period of exploration, contemplating concepts such as God's state of being and the nature of evil in the world. From the perspective of a church-baby such as myself who was taught these things since infancy, I never questioned that God was beyond the limitations of time, because I could never wrap my head around it therefore I just accepted it as fact (after all, if my parents believed it why shouldn't I?). Augustine, however, had no prior understanding or exposure to the idea that God can have being without existing in the physical realm; that is, the plane of existence that us humans dwell in. It was not until he had a vision of God that he was finally able to break out of his Manichaeistic mindset. He writes, "I saw that all finite things are in you, not as though you were a place that contained them, but in a different manner . . . I saw too that all things are fit and proper not only to the places but also to the times in which they exist, and that you, who are the only eternal Being, did not begin to work only after countless ages of time had elapsed, because no age of time, past or still to come, could either come or go if it were not that you abide for ever and cause time to come and go" (Augustine, VII.15). 

Augustine's curiosity of the Christian faith and his previously limited exposure to Christianity allowed him to approach the faith with an open mind and evaluate the Christian faith from an outsider's perspective. While I don't think I would want to live a life apart from God before becoming a believer, I am envious of the perspective of new believers. Concepts like God's eternal being have always been accepted in my mind with limited doubt here and there, but the experience of approaching and learning such knowledge with honest questions seems like it would teach me so much more.

Comments

  1. While reading your blog post, I realized the amount of beliefs I put my faith in just because my parents taught me to believe it. However, I would say that that sentence applied to me in the past. Those things i believed just because I was taught to agree now things I believe because I believe them to be true. I agree with you that it would be amazing to see God from the perspective of someone coming to Christ with no Christian background. However, I am very thankful that I grew up in a Christian household where my parents presented Christian beliefs to me from a young age.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...