Skip to main content

Beowulf and the Bible // Abigale Bell

 


Something that stood out to me in this portion of Beowulf was the writer's apparent knowledge of Scripture. Numerous times throughout the reading I found references to Biblical history and Biblical representations of God. 

When the author introduces us to the lineage of the monsters, Grendel and his mother, he alludes to the story of Cain and Able. 

"And from Cain there sprang misbegotten spirits, among them Grendel..." (Beowulf, 1265-1266).

Later in the story, the author describes the hilt of the sword Beowulf uses to slay Grendel's mother. Engraved upon the hilt was a depiction very similar to The Flood of Genesis 6-7.

"...the Almighty made the waters rise, drowned them in the deluge of retribution" (1692-1693).

"Finally, the water covered even the highest mountains on the earth...God wiped out every living thing on the earth..." (Genesis 7:19, 23). 

Because the story of Beowulf was set in a place where there was no apparent knowledge of Christianity, it seems ironic that the story would be so rife with Christian references. 

Not only is the Bible often mentioned so directly, but it is alluded to through mentions of God in the story. Line 978 of Beowulf says, "...the mighty judgement of God in majesty..." Later, we see "...the wondrous gifts God has showered on him: He relied for help on the Lord of All, on His care and favor..." (1271-1273). The allusions continue throughout the story. In a world of paganism, it seems ironic how readily the characters make Scriptural references. 

It was mentioned in class that Beowulf may have been written by someone in the church, or at least someone who was formerly so. This idea seems to make more sense now that I see how often the Bible is mentioned. 


Commented on Hailey Morgan's and Emmett's posts.

Comments

  1. Acute observations, Abigail! I can confirm that the numerous biblical allusions have confounded literary historians for years. Unfortunately, it is a mystery what the purpose behind writing this work is. I believe that it might be a discipleship tactic, trying to appeal to pagans with a mixture of Scripture and mythological tendencies, but I don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like that you were able to recognize the Biblical references in the book and the irony it created. I liked that the book was able to bring Christianity into a book set somewhere where it was believed that there was little if any knowledge about Christianity.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love the scriptural references and nods. This may be an inappropriate comparison but it feels much like Easter eggs throughout Star Wars films and series. As a Christian, those tidbits of scripture or scripture like areas call me deeper into the storyline allowing me to disappear into the book while reading it is quite pleasurable. I also agree with Jamie on it being a discipleship tactic. I think it is one of the best things in the world when you are able to see the crimson thread (so to speak) flow into non scripture. I am reminded of something my sophomore small group leader told me, "you may be the only bible someone ever reads." I feel like that is the case with many other books as well.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...