Skip to main content

Beowulf: a Type of Messiah? ~ Emmett Bryant

    Although the title of my blog may seem sacrilegious, I promise it is not! The Danes had suffered much harm at the hands of Grendel during Section I of Beowulf, and it can be assumed that they were fearful and dismayed at the turn of events. They went from having an amazing feast and a celebration to having to cower in their homes in the wake of Grendel's destruction. The author of Beowulf was clearly setting the stage for a heroic, above average character to restore peace to the Danes. This character was none other than Beowulf. 
    Now why would I use the designation 'messiah' to possibly describe Beowulf? Beowulf came from the Geats after hearing of the horrendous creature Grendel. His name was already quite popular in the surrounding areas because of his strength and might. Even Hrothgar describes Beowulf as having the strength of thirty men in each of his hands. Beowulf was clearly exalted above the normal manhood status and surely news of his arrival brought hope into the hearts of the Danes. Beowulf also purveyed a sense of authority and youthfulness in contrast with the aged Hrothgar. If a king that experienced much military success and prosperity could not defeat a creature such as Grendel, then someone who thought they had the capability to do so had to be someone on another level. 
    The praise Beowulf received for defeating Grendel was clearly merited, but it was done in a rejoicing manner. The people were not only rejoicing over the death of the monster, but they were also rejoicing over Beowulf's victory. He was honored as a hero, for he had accomplished exactly what he had come to the land to do. There was no shortage to the people's praises (until they learned of Grendel's mother) for their hero (messiah) had won. 
    So what makes me see Beowulf as a type of messiah is the fact that he was most likely seen as someone on a higher plane than everyone else. Not in a sense of deity but more so in a royal, or renowned sense. When he arrived in the land of the Danes he brought hope with him, causing people to have a reason to not be afraid. The Danes were in need of salvation from Grendel, so that they could restore their normal lives and Beowulf helped them do just that. He defeated Grendel and for a moment (short-lived in the scope of the entire story) brought them peace, safety, and normality. To the people, whether they thought of him in such a way or not, Beowulf was a type of messiah. 

I commented on Emma Kate Patterson's post and on Leanne White/s post. 

Comments

  1. Hi Emmett! Great post! I think it's really interesting that you drew a parallel between Beowulf and messiah. He certainly displayed larger than life traits. He was viewed as a savior. I think this heightened, almost deistic view of Beowulf is something like what the Israelites may have held for their promised Messiah.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting comparison you made between Beowulf and the messiah. He was saw as a savior of the people for his heroic actions. The type of messiah Beowulf represents sounds a lot like the type the Jews were looking for when Jesus came. They wanted a heroic, above average man to come a fight off the Roman Empire and then serve as king over them, definitely not the type that Jesus is.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...