Skip to main content

Beowulf: a Type of Messiah? ~ Emmett Bryant

    Although the title of my blog may seem sacrilegious, I promise it is not! The Danes had suffered much harm at the hands of Grendel during Section I of Beowulf, and it can be assumed that they were fearful and dismayed at the turn of events. They went from having an amazing feast and a celebration to having to cower in their homes in the wake of Grendel's destruction. The author of Beowulf was clearly setting the stage for a heroic, above average character to restore peace to the Danes. This character was none other than Beowulf. 
    Now why would I use the designation 'messiah' to possibly describe Beowulf? Beowulf came from the Geats after hearing of the horrendous creature Grendel. His name was already quite popular in the surrounding areas because of his strength and might. Even Hrothgar describes Beowulf as having the strength of thirty men in each of his hands. Beowulf was clearly exalted above the normal manhood status and surely news of his arrival brought hope into the hearts of the Danes. Beowulf also purveyed a sense of authority and youthfulness in contrast with the aged Hrothgar. If a king that experienced much military success and prosperity could not defeat a creature such as Grendel, then someone who thought they had the capability to do so had to be someone on another level. 
    The praise Beowulf received for defeating Grendel was clearly merited, but it was done in a rejoicing manner. The people were not only rejoicing over the death of the monster, but they were also rejoicing over Beowulf's victory. He was honored as a hero, for he had accomplished exactly what he had come to the land to do. There was no shortage to the people's praises (until they learned of Grendel's mother) for their hero (messiah) had won. 
    So what makes me see Beowulf as a type of messiah is the fact that he was most likely seen as someone on a higher plane than everyone else. Not in a sense of deity but more so in a royal, or renowned sense. When he arrived in the land of the Danes he brought hope with him, causing people to have a reason to not be afraid. The Danes were in need of salvation from Grendel, so that they could restore their normal lives and Beowulf helped them do just that. He defeated Grendel and for a moment (short-lived in the scope of the entire story) brought them peace, safety, and normality. To the people, whether they thought of him in such a way or not, Beowulf was a type of messiah. 

I commented on Emma Kate Patterson's post and on Leanne White/s post. 

Comments

  1. Hi Emmett! Great post! I think it's really interesting that you drew a parallel between Beowulf and messiah. He certainly displayed larger than life traits. He was viewed as a savior. I think this heightened, almost deistic view of Beowulf is something like what the Israelites may have held for their promised Messiah.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting comparison you made between Beowulf and the messiah. He was saw as a savior of the people for his heroic actions. The type of messiah Beowulf represents sounds a lot like the type the Jews were looking for when Jesus came. They wanted a heroic, above average man to come a fight off the Roman Empire and then serve as king over them, definitely not the type that Jesus is.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...