Skip to main content

Consistency- Jamie Peters

       Okay, that was a lot of new information, most of which I don't understand. The older I get and the more I meet people, the more I realize how diverse the world is, especially in Christianity. Everyone believes that they are doing Christianity the right way, whether it be in the music service, the preaching, or the teaching. I will forever be impressed by the intricacies of the Catholic branch of Christianity because their belief in what they are doing is right is structural. Every moment of the Mass, every moment of the year, every moment of the DAY is planned out specifically so that its followers are constantly in God's presence. 

       This concept of structured belief is foreign to the ears of Protestants like me. Because of sin in the world, the possibility of this lifestyle becoming corrupted is certain, and it has shown itself time and time again (say what you want, but the Crusades were anything but Christian). Before reading these articles on how each part of the liturgical year is intricately designed to point to Christ, I had assumed that Roman Catholicism had been wrong since the beginning, but I was wrong. I still do not agree with their old tradition of only the teachers having Bibles, but now I see that they expressed the message of the Gospel to the masses in an easy-to-remember way. It is evident that much of their inspiration comes from Psalm 119:11: " I have treasured Your word in my heart, so that I may not sin against You."


I commented on Hailey Morgan's and Jessef's posts.

Comments

  1. Hi Jamie! I love your post! Your words express my feelings as I read about the history of liturgy in the Catholic Church. The musical structure, though Greek to me, demonstrated a reverence of God and His Word which is often lost on Christians today. The Catholic's intentionality in recognizing every part of the liturgical year is a testament to their faith and devotion. This is something I think modern day Protestant Christians could learn from.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, your post was really good. I love the point you made about realizing that Catholicism has a place in our Church history, because so many people do not realize that. Although Catholicism has strayed from the Bible throughout recent history does not change the fact that a lot of Bible doctrine is based on original Catholic though (such as St. Augustine). So I am glad that you pointed that out.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...