Skip to main content

Foreshadowing, Anyone?-Rachael Gregson

 


    During the celebration following Grendel's death, something seemed fishy to me, and that just may be because I've read the book and seen the movie before. Everything about it just appeared way too forced for me, especially when the queen was involved. She made a big show in saying that there were to be no whispers in Herot that night and that she has complete trust in Hrothgar and Beowulf both. While all of this may look like a queen just consoling her exasperated country, it felt an awful lot like the epic's way of foreshadowing the next big attack. Things always get worse before they can get better, and although Grendel took a heavy toll out of Hrothgar's kingdom, Beowulf killing him was just a little too easy for all the mess the monster created prior to his arrival. The queen's heavily enforced relief only further proves my point. 

    Even the poetry sang at the feast was suspicious and could be interpreted as foreshadowing. Not only was it honoring Siegmund, it was also about Finn, a Frisian king murdered by someone of Danish blood. The story behind Finn is a dark one and sticks out like a sore thumb during the celebration. After all, in the story about Finn, there was a period in between battles between the Danes and the Frisians where he thought the fighting was over. He and Hengest, head of the Danes, made peace, and the Danes and the Frisians occupied the same land for awhile until Finn was finally killed. It is a wonder why they chose to intercorporate something so tragic during a happy time, unless of course it is a hidden warning of what is still to come.

I commented on posts by Hailey Morgan and Leanne White.

Comments

  1. Brooke HutchesonFebruary 21, 2021 at 1:35 PM

    Wow, I never noticed that. That is crazy how the foreshadowing happened over a big event like a celebration. This tells how important the author was trying to point out that the plot was repeating itself (since that is the whole point of Beowulf).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Madalyn DillardFebruary 21, 2021 at 9:17 PM

    I love foreshadowing, but I always seem to miss it like I’m this instant. Thank you for pointing it out. It is very interesting.

    Madalyn Dillard

    ReplyDelete
  3. Leanne ElizabethFebruary 22, 2021 at 10:44 AM

    I am a fan of foreshadowing. It is fun to speculate what happens in the future of the story and you become more engrossed in it. What a brilliant way to discuss how the plot repeats itself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Haylee LyndFebruary 22, 2021 at 10:36 PM

    The epic almost foreshadows too much. Everything is foreshadowing. The little tales told are of treachery and misfortune which is what is to come. The queen and everyone else are far too relieved by the killing of Grendel and celebrate too greatly for something else to not go wrong. I think if this much foreshadowing happened within modern writing, we would find it overdone and cliche.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more