Skip to main content

Hero or Zero - Abigale Bell

 


So Beowulf...what a hero. Arriving with a band of soldiers decked out in all their armor, Beowulf comes to defend his ally from the terrible monster, Grendel. He defends his reputation as this fantastic, almost god-like warrior. 

But is he really a hero? Yes, he proves himself a worthy match for Grendel. In keeping for a prize the monster's arm, torn off in their struggle, Beowulf displays his mastery over Grendel. But does a shiny coat of armor, or the strength to tear limb from limb make a hero?

Recently, I rewatched Marvel's Thor. The entire premise of the movie is Thor's journey from the arrogant, unworthy guy that he was, to the true hero he becomes. Beowulf, as an arrogant warrior, protects his family's honor by defending the Danes, allies, from Grendel. Thor tries to defend his father's honor by challenging the Frost Giants. He defeats them initially, but they remain enemies; the Frost Giants wait from afar for an opportunity to exact their revenge. Grendel is defeated by Beowulf initially, but what happens next? Will this victory last? Will Beowulf continue to be a proud and arrogant man? Will he instead, like Thor, become a true hero?


Commented on Emma Kate's and Haylee's posts. 

Comments

  1. Addison ZandaFebruary 15, 2021 at 8:14 PM

    I think its crazy to see how much strength and heroism came to Beowulf's name after defeating Grendel. Do you thing this fight and win was a God thing? I think his win does make him a hero just for the defeating of a demon who terrorized people in a harsh way. I said this in my blog post, but we can kind of relate it to David and Goliath.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haylee LyndFebruary 15, 2021 at 9:22 PM

    On one hand, I see Beowulf as a hero becomes he comes to the aid of another land, not for money but for honor, and I think he truly does come to help too. I don't think he just wants to boast. He he is quite boastful, but from what we know, everything he says of himself is true. He kind of is a hero. He'd be a better one if he didn't boast so much and if maybe he didn't, ya know, watch his crew member die even though Beowulf could obviously take on Grendel, but nobody's perfect.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more