Skip to main content

Mama-Bear // Clabo

Okay, so one thing that I thought was pretty interesting was the differentiation between Grendel and his mother. Grendel, in my opinion, is more of a representation of pure evil than his mother. Grendel terrorized Heorot because he was envious of peoples' happiness and joy. Unlike his mother, he continued to attack the town for a long period of time, at least long enough for word to spread to Beowulf. Grendel's mother only attacked the town once, and in doing so she reclaimed her child's detached arm. To me, that is more of an honorable thing than an evil one. We see these kinds of actions in Greek epics and other war stories where the warriors or soldiers go and collect the bodies or amour of the fallen. She also was also aggravated for an understandable reason. Her son was killed. To me, even though she may have represented as a more primordial evil than Grendel, I feel as if she was less evil. She was more like a "Mama-bear" with a vengeance sort of character. Having this almost lesser-evil character in mind, I feel as if she had a little too much hype around her. In order to reach her, one had to go through what can be imagined as almost pure evil and survive a whole bunch of other beasts who infested the area. Her lair became brighter when she had been killed which means that the darkness of the environment was attributed to her evil presence there. 

What are your thoughts about this? Am I missing something, did she really just not seem as evil as Grendel?

P.S. I commented on Abbie Hedden's and Madalyn Dillard's posts

Comments

  1. I see what you mean by seeming less evil. I am not completely sure how I think about this. However, I would say we do not know all that she has done or what she does. We can, as you said, see that darkness surrounds her. So, her darkness has to come from somewhere. That somewhere is evil. She was also born out of evil so she has to be evil. But, if she is less evil is still in question.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know, now that you say it I'm beginning to shift my perspective of Grendel's mother's attack. Initially I viewed it as an angry monster's revenge on a town and nothing more, but now it's obvious to me that her attack was more heartfelt than anything. She wanted to avenge and honor her son, which she did by retrieving his arm, and also, it's true that Grendel was the one terrorizing the town; Grendel's mother had seemingly backed off from that kind of behavior.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...