Skip to main content

Mama-Bear // Clabo

Okay, so one thing that I thought was pretty interesting was the differentiation between Grendel and his mother. Grendel, in my opinion, is more of a representation of pure evil than his mother. Grendel terrorized Heorot because he was envious of peoples' happiness and joy. Unlike his mother, he continued to attack the town for a long period of time, at least long enough for word to spread to Beowulf. Grendel's mother only attacked the town once, and in doing so she reclaimed her child's detached arm. To me, that is more of an honorable thing than an evil one. We see these kinds of actions in Greek epics and other war stories where the warriors or soldiers go and collect the bodies or amour of the fallen. She also was also aggravated for an understandable reason. Her son was killed. To me, even though she may have represented as a more primordial evil than Grendel, I feel as if she was less evil. She was more like a "Mama-bear" with a vengeance sort of character. Having this almost lesser-evil character in mind, I feel as if she had a little too much hype around her. In order to reach her, one had to go through what can be imagined as almost pure evil and survive a whole bunch of other beasts who infested the area. Her lair became brighter when she had been killed which means that the darkness of the environment was attributed to her evil presence there. 

What are your thoughts about this? Am I missing something, did she really just not seem as evil as Grendel?

P.S. I commented on Abbie Hedden's and Madalyn Dillard's posts

Comments

  1. I see what you mean by seeming less evil. I am not completely sure how I think about this. However, I would say we do not know all that she has done or what she does. We can, as you said, see that darkness surrounds her. So, her darkness has to come from somewhere. That somewhere is evil. She was also born out of evil so she has to be evil. But, if she is less evil is still in question.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know, now that you say it I'm beginning to shift my perspective of Grendel's mother's attack. Initially I viewed it as an angry monster's revenge on a town and nothing more, but now it's obvious to me that her attack was more heartfelt than anything. She wanted to avenge and honor her son, which she did by retrieving his arm, and also, it's true that Grendel was the one terrorizing the town; Grendel's mother had seemingly backed off from that kind of behavior.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...