Skip to main content

This Story is Familiar - Clabo

As I was reading through this, I found its plot and storyline to be very familiar. So far it has reminded me a lot of the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Witcher series, and even a little bit of the of the story of Van Helsing. Honestly these are my favorite kind of story lines. An evil monster of epic proportions that cannot be defeated by any mere mortal meets in combat with a unique man with immeasurable abilities. Even thought I have never read this before, I can only assume that Beowulf is going to have to sacrifice himself at the expense of the fate of the world if this plot line does continue to resemble others like it. Now, I may be joking, but I will be quite astonished if I am correct in my guess/assumption. 

What are your opinions and thoughts about the story?

P.S. I commented on Caroline Tucker's and Addison Zanda's posts.

Comments

  1. SPOILER ALERT
    I do not know if I should spoil or not......, but your assumption is correct about the story. I think the plot is fascinating since it does have a dragon as the antagonist (my blog post). Also, the story is very thrilling since it focuses on one man overcoming a beast to save his people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd say Geralt from the Witcher is actually a pretty spot on comparison with someone like Beowulf. Both are skilled in arms and are athletic, strong, and seemingly are calm under immense pressure. As for the sacrifice plot point, I really think that Beowulf will actually survive this ordeal, as the people of the medieval ages were more into stories of triumph than tragedy unlike the Greeks and Romans.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...