Skip to main content

Church Dramas - Leanne White

Liturgical dramas gained popularity a long time ago and slowly developed into the dramas we know today that reenact the stories of the Bible, particularly with Jesus. Today, in the Church, dramas and plays are seen as cringe-worthy and cheesy events that the youth group puts on. Believe me, I have performed in many (do not judge me), and even lay awake at night haunted by embarrassing moments from the past-most of which are church dramas. Whether you enjoy them or wince at the thought, it is important to acknowledge the form of worship is, in fact, a form of worship. Just like praise bands and musical worship, it is not for your entertainment but rather to encourage you to entertain the Lord.

I replied to Hailey Morgan and Abigaile Bell

Comments

  1. Ian BlairMarch 29, 2021 at 1:50 PM

    Following up from what you said here, I think it's important to understand that dramas are a form of expression of worship. The fact of the matter is that some people have a talent for displaying emotions, changing their voice, etc. and acting is how they express their talents. I personally believe that the fine arts should never be scorned in a place such as the house of God. Good post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haylee LyndMarch 29, 2021 at 8:56 PM

    When I began reading this piece, my first thoughts were that the plays would be weird, but you're exactly right to say that it is an act of worship. Also, I think they might would help people who didn't understand the gospel or something to better understand. It made me think of the movies we have about the Resurrection, about Moses, about the rapture, etc. Even if not completely accurate, they bring to life something that a nonbeliever or new believer would not entirely be able to imagine.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Addison ZandaMarch 29, 2021 at 10:31 PM

    I think these dramas were another way to worship and learn about who our Creator is. It's crazy to know we did these plays as kids that would help us gain knowledge outside of reading the Bible. There was definitely humorous and embarrassing moments doing these at a young age and I'm right there with you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more