Skip to main content

Church Music Two Ways // Abigale Bell

Hildegard Von Bingen makes me want to stand up and shout "You GO, girl!" She is my new role model, my hero. Her devotion in faith to take vows at only sixteen and stay true to them speaks to a determined will. This is further brought to light when she faces opposition from the church and continues to stand firm in her beliefs. In a world predominantly male, Hildegard's achievements are all the more incredible. 

A few thoughts on her views of music:

When reading Hildegard's letter about the disallowance of music in her convent, I was struck by her strongly held beliefs evidenced by her sharp criticism of the church. I was reminded of Augustine's musings about church music. I think Hildegard and Augustine each show unique perspectives. 

Hildegard made mention of the Biblical significants of song from Psalm 150. She stated her opinion that music as worship pleases God. 

"Thus they who without the weight of sure reason impose silence upon a church in the matter of songs is praise of God, and thereby unjustly deprive God of the honor of his praise on earth, will be deprived themselves of the participation in the angelic praises heard in Heaven, unless they make amends by true regret and humble penitence" (Hildegard Von Bingen, 48). 

Augustine takes a slightly different approach to music in that he considers its ministerial value to people. 

"Without committing myself to an irrevocable opinion, I am inclined to approve of the custom of singing in church, in order that by indulging the ears of weaker spirits may be inspired with feelings of devotion. Yet when I find the singing itself more moving than the truth which it conveys, I confess that this is a grievous sin, and at those times I would prefer not to hear the singer" (Augustine, 239). 

Both perspectives are valid in their own right. They are two sides of the same coin, giving us two different looks at church music. However, Hildegard's passionate words make Augustine's sound limp in comparison.  


Commented on Rachael's and Madalyn's posts.

Comments

  1. I think Hildegard is very interesting since she was so young, when she followed God's calling for her life. I like how you compared Augustine and Hildegard. Hildegard viewed music as a background to the lyrics, but Augustine thought that the music overpowered the lyrics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Both views are valid, but I agree more with Hildegard. Hildegard knew that music can be just as important as the lyrics of the song to God.

      Delete
  2. You are absolutely right in calling her a role model. She should be an inspiration to us all to stand firm in our beliefs. I also like that you added a comparison to Augustine.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with both Augustine and Hildegard in a way. Music can be used for so many purposes it is almost like a weapon. We, as Christians, should be careful to not lose sight as to what we are using the music for.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Music is used in so many different ways and scenarios in today's time. I like to use it for sadness. BUT, if music is your calling for God then you should pursue it and that's what she did. Quite an inspiration for a lot of people as we should also be firm in our faith and not lose track for what God has in store for us.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...