Skip to main content

Dante the Fanboy//Haylee Lynd

     


 The biggest question I had while reading Dante's Inferno was "Why Virgil?" Why does this one poet get to represent human reason and lead Dante through Hell? Then, I realized...Virgil has already led someone through Hell, Aeneas. Now, this is metaphorical. Virgil does not literally lead Aeneas through Hell as he does in Dante's Inferno. Rather, he write Aeneas' journey through the underworld in The Aeneid. By writing Virgil into his story, Dante in a way gives credit to his inspiration. 

     The similarities between the two works is, obviously, that they are both written as Epic journeys. Also, both are led by a guide. Aeneas is led by the Sybil, a priestess, of Apollo's temple, while Dante is led by Virgil. In addition, they both contain many sections within them designated to certain types of individuals and sinners. Virgil's version of the Underworld includes a place just inside the gate for the dead souls who have not received proper burial and are, thus, refused passage across the river by Charon; the Fields of Mourning, for those who died from love; a fortress in which the most terrible sinners receive punishment; and the Blessed Groves, where the good wander about in peace and comfort. Dante's version of the Underworld has nine circles, and similar to Virgils's version, punishments get worse as one descends the circles. 


P.S. I commented on Lily's and Madalyn's blog posts.

Comments

  1. Emma Kate PattersonMarch 16, 2021 at 8:56 AM

    I like how you related the current book we are reading to another book you have already read. I think it is cool how the two tie in together and I think we can learn so much more when we can relate one book to another book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Logan TurnerMarch 16, 2021 at 9:40 AM

    I never really thought to make the connection between the Aeneid and Dante's choice of Virgil as the guide. Now that I think of it, it does make sense. Like you said, Virgil metaphorically guides Aeneas through the Underworld, and literally guides Dante in Inferno. It really makes you wonder how Virgil would have interpreted Dante's version of Hell.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more