Skip to main content

Good and Evil, Fact and Opinion ~ Emmett Bryant

     What is good and what is evil? Some people would have us believe that there is no definite good or evil and others would also contend that there are concrete definitions for good and evil. But in the case of Beowulf, is Grendel's mother evil? Does she exhibit good qualities or bad qualities? Her story is not very black and white in my opinion and if her story had been told from a different perspective then perhaps we would be more sympathetic for her and share in her grief. She was not some wild beast attacking people solely for the act of attacking. She was retaliating. Her child had been taken from her, so surely she was motivated by sadness and a feeling of loss. 

    Does that excuse the damage and heartache she caused for other people? Of course not. As the old adage says, "Two wrongs don't make a right." You could look at the situation from another perspective. If the townspeople were not going to bring justice for the death of her son, then who would? Surely she would take judgement into her own hands if she saw that it was not being delivered adequately. She did just that, and because of that she was made out to be evil. Like I said, I am not trying to excuse the wrong she did, I am simply trying to view it in the context of the circumstances through which she had suffered. 

    Too often we view people in a negative light because we see nothing but the current wrong they have committed. We refuse to admit that they themselves were victims of an external event. And when someone wrongs us personally, we want them to be punished for it without question not even considering all the times we have avoided punishment that we have rightly deserved. So in the story of Beowulf, my heart sympathizes with Grendel's mother, because she responded to someone else's evil with evil she is seen as the villain and I don't think it should be so. 

I commented on Caroline Tucker's post and Leanne White's post. 

Comments

  1. Hi Emmett! Interesting idea. Looking at the story from the perspective of Grendel's mother, it is easier to see her loss and sympathize. It is true that discerning good and evil is difficult in some situations. I do, however, think the reaction is what makes the difference. Grendel's mother reacted in outrage and grief. She sought revenge for her son's death. Her actions made her evil.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked your post! I wrote something similar last week. I honestly think that she was evil for what she did, but only because revenge is not a righteous act. Without the context of sin and God, there is no right and wrong, and we can easily make the argument that she was completely justified in what she did.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...