Skip to main content

Hero pt. 2 - Leanne White

In a previous blog post, I talked about how we can see Beowulf is a hero based on how he is written. Now, I want to talk about what kind of hero he might be. Before, I compared his Anglo-Saxon description with a Greek description of a hero. He is a hero because He is honourable and accomplished, written as a boastful and arrogant character. He could be seen as a Christian hero. This makes sense when you look at his characteristics. The characteristics of Beowulf are like that of "heroes" in the Bible, and are characteristics based on Scripture.

 I commented on Hailey Morgan and Rachael Gregson's post.

Comments

  1. Yes indeed, Beowulf is the hero. The thing about stories though, is that anyone can be made into a hero if they are portrayed the right way. So was Beowulf truly a hero with good intentions? It doesn't matter, he's described and applauded in the story as if he is one. Not saying he did not behave as a hero, but I always like to wonder.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There's definitely different viewpoints as to how Beowulf may or may not be a hero. From my perspective, I believe he is one. Take the fight in the beginning of the story. It shows a strong relation to David and Goliath. Beowulf travels to take down a beast that wrecked a society as if that demon controlled so many people. Beowulf possessed a strong amount of strength and leadership that allowed people to him as a fearless warrior, hero.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I definitely see him as a hero but I am struggling to see if he is indeed a hero fighting for his own honor or for monetary gain. I would love to have a deeper conversation regarding that. I understand it is a well set tradition for a hero to receive gifts but the way he recalls the receiving of gifts in and around lines 2130-2170 sounds mildly too focused upon them. would love some insight.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...