Skip to main content

Hildegard: A Woman We Should Aspire Towards // Abbie Hedden

 I've found myself in a recent struggle between God's command to submit and my own convictions on personal boundaries. What does God call me to submit? I must lay down my life for my brothers, love my neighbors, and somewhere in the future, submit to my husband as unto the Lord. That is a lot of submitting going on for a stubborn, selfish, prideful woman! I mainly ponder the idea of submitting to authorities and the government while reading about Hildegard. In our American society today, there is a lot of controversy regarding how much one should submit to the government. Rather than ramble about my own opinions on this matter, I think it's important to look at Hildegard as an example. Her first priority is obedience to God, then to authorities. No one becomes Prioress of an Abbey by disregarding rules; by entering the convent at age 7 and taking her vows at 16, Hildegard illustrates a clear devotion to the Church. However, she does two things that conflict with The Church's rules. She allows someone who is excommunicated to be buried at her convent (though her motives were not discussed), and she writes a letter explaining that she cannot follow The Church's disciplinary order to cease the singing of Divine Office. Her reasoning is that Scripture commands her and all Christians to worship the Lord in that way. The text says that "Church officials eventually relented". What does this teach us as modern day Christian Americans? We must follow authorities, as they are set in place by God, and follow God when authorities command us to disregard Him.


PS Isabelle and Emmett

Comments

  1. Caroline TuckerMarch 29, 2021 at 11:26 PM

    I find Hildegard’s strength to stand on her faith very inspiring. As Christians, we need to be constantly reminded that we need to stand strong on our faith, especially when the world is against us. Another thing we, as believers, need to remember is that if we are not having to stand up and on our faith, it is a time of preparation for that time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jackson RiddleMarch 29, 2021 at 11:39 PM

    I agree with your stance on how far we must follow authorities. The Bible tells us time and time again to submit to authority, emphasizing the importance of such behavior. We are to follow authority, but only if their motives are true. At the end of the day we serve God, not man, so if what authority commands goes against the will of God we are not to follow.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more