Skip to main content

Hildegard: A Woman We Should Aspire Towards // Abbie Hedden

 I've found myself in a recent struggle between God's command to submit and my own convictions on personal boundaries. What does God call me to submit? I must lay down my life for my brothers, love my neighbors, and somewhere in the future, submit to my husband as unto the Lord. That is a lot of submitting going on for a stubborn, selfish, prideful woman! I mainly ponder the idea of submitting to authorities and the government while reading about Hildegard. In our American society today, there is a lot of controversy regarding how much one should submit to the government. Rather than ramble about my own opinions on this matter, I think it's important to look at Hildegard as an example. Her first priority is obedience to God, then to authorities. No one becomes Prioress of an Abbey by disregarding rules; by entering the convent at age 7 and taking her vows at 16, Hildegard illustrates a clear devotion to the Church. However, she does two things that conflict with The Church's rules. She allows someone who is excommunicated to be buried at her convent (though her motives were not discussed), and she writes a letter explaining that she cannot follow The Church's disciplinary order to cease the singing of Divine Office. Her reasoning is that Scripture commands her and all Christians to worship the Lord in that way. The text says that "Church officials eventually relented". What does this teach us as modern day Christian Americans? We must follow authorities, as they are set in place by God, and follow God when authorities command us to disregard Him.


PS Isabelle and Emmett

Comments

  1. I find Hildegard’s strength to stand on her faith very inspiring. As Christians, we need to be constantly reminded that we need to stand strong on our faith, especially when the world is against us. Another thing we, as believers, need to remember is that if we are not having to stand up and on our faith, it is a time of preparation for that time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with your stance on how far we must follow authorities. The Bible tells us time and time again to submit to authority, emphasizing the importance of such behavior. We are to follow authority, but only if their motives are true. At the end of the day we serve God, not man, so if what authority commands goes against the will of God we are not to follow.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...