Skip to main content

In Search of Wholeness-Rachael Gregson



Hildegard von Bingen is a woman to be admired, not just because her opera Ordo Virtutum was one of the the first plays about virtue, but also because she wrote it during a time where everyone was hesitant to explore what the natural human was like. An interesting thing to note about it is that while the purpose of the Ordo Virtutum was to encourage its audience to do better so that one day they may inherit eternal life, it does not really go into detail about biblical events, what the life of a saint looks like, or even so much as miracles. Rather, it elaborates on more of the virtues by giving human-like characteristics to them, and also about the Devil fighting over the destiny of a human soul. 

At first, I was not quite sure what to make of this portrayal of hers on the virtues. To me, it sort of sounds like she was implying there's a sense of danger in trying to find our destinies, paths, purposes in life, as if all this struggling and searching allows some sort of crack that the Enemy can slip through. For those just wanting to discover themselves as well as learn their virtues and strengths, it's almost like a spit in the face. 

But I think Hildegard intends it to be a gentle warning, not a spit in the face after all. The moment we know that we are not whole is the moment that the Enemy knows this as well, and he will stop at nothing to attempt to keep us this way. The more we get closer to filling the hole inside of us properly with the goodness of God and the plan and purpose He has for us, the more the devil will send attack after attack. Hildegard is far from discouraging a search for wholeness. Through the Ordo Virtutum, she's just recommending that believers be completely aware of Satan's schemes while on this search.

I commented on posts by Brooke and Hailey M.

Comments

  1. I recall the example of stereotypical sports coaches who treat their players with a kind of hard love in order to try and challenge them to be better at their craft. It seems that Hildegard was thinking along the same lines with the audience and the theme of the Ordo Virtutum, and having more structure or discipline in the way a child is raised or someone conducts their everyday tasks would not likely hurt in the effort to obtain a better life like what some denominations believed one could do. Having a lesson to learn from a story is a defining characteristic of drama and other audiovisual arts, and respect and discipline were certainly at the top of that list during Hildegard's time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Rachael! Interesting post! I think you were spot on when you mentioned how Hildegard implied danger in searching for yourself. And I agree with your idea that maybe she was warning rather than reprimanding. It is definitely important for us, as Christians, to remember that the Enemy will take even the smallest doubt or fear, and use it to turn us away from God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...