Skip to main content

Love on the Line // Abigale Bell

 


From a modern perspective, courtly love is something that is hard to understand. It's hard to imagine that people were able to separate their desire for physical connection form their admiration of a person. Compared to a modern view of love, which is often completely focused on the physical aspect, courtly love is very clearly an idealized version of love. However, it is too far of a stretch to believe that every "relationship" that began as courtly love remained pure. Canto V of Dante's Inferno gives us a clear view of the line that should not be crossed. 

Canto V describes Dante's experience in the second circle of Hell. He has descended from the first circle, Limbo, to a place of greater punishment. As he looks around, Dante sees two spirits floating side-by-side, Francesca and her lover. He asks how they came to be there. Francesca tells their sad story. What began as an innocent meeting (the two simply reading together) ended in their surrendering to the temptation of the moment. "But one particular moment alone it was/ Defeated us: the longed for smile, it said,/ Was kissed by that most noble lover..." (Dante, 118-120). It was in one moment that they crossed the line and that moment doom them. Both killed for their actions, they were cast into the second circle of Hell to be blown in the winds forever. 

The picture of Francesca and her lover is a reminder that one moment can change a good situation into one that is deeply regretted. Such a dichotomy between courtly love and the second circle of Hell is a stark picture of what can happen when the line is crossed. 


Commented on Braylan's and Emmett's posts.

Comments

  1. IsabelleMarch 16, 2021 at 8:07 AM

    I'm going to be honest, I passed over Francesca, and I really regret it now. You made a great connection with courtly love gone wrong between she and her lover. I agree with the conclusion you drew. One wrong decision can deeply burden our souls. Also, I love that the further we get into the assigned readings the more women play roles in lessons to be learned. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Emma Kate PattersonMarch 16, 2021 at 8:58 AM

    I like how you related the book we are currently reading to a subject we learned about a few weeks ago in class. It is cool that we can study courtly love in multiple books and use the knowledge we have about courtly love to be able to better understand what we are reading.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Braylan StringfellowMarch 16, 2021 at 9:01 AM

    I find it interesting how one choice can completely change the course of someone's life. That one moment was enough to doom Francesca to the second circle of hell. Kind of makes me wanna think even more thoroughly with some of my decisions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more