Skip to main content

Man's logic vs God's logic // Braylan Stringfellow

    It goes without saying that hell in the Bible is nothing like hell in The Inferno. In the Bible, hell is the same for everyone there no matter what someone did on earth. But in The Inferno, hell is divided up in what I look as different punishments for different things, similar to how there is different punishments for crimes in today's judicial system. The one I find most interesting is circle I. 

    Circle I is where the virtuous pagans go along with those who were not baptized. Circle I is the least severe level of hell. What I find interesting is the reason as to why virtuous pagans get the least severe punishment. Dante said, "The signature of honor they left on earth is recognized in Heaven and wins them ease in Hell out of God's favor" (Dante 29). It is almost like works-based salvation, but instead of heaven you get "easy hell." Also, the reason they get to go here is because they did not know about God. So now its like a "you didn't know any better so we will go easy on you" kind of logic. 

    This shows me the huge difference between the way man thinks and God thinks. Man likes to give the benefit of the doubt and to show a lot of mercy and grace to a fault. Man likes to justify his own doings by saying like "I didn't know any better." Whereas God has all sin on an even playing field, and says in Romans 1:20, "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen...so that they are without excuse."


I commented on Abigale Bell's and Haley Riddle's post

Comments

  1. Emmett BryantMarch 15, 2021 at 5:38 PM

    Hey Braylan,
    I really like how you described Circle I as "easy hell." Going off of what you said, not only does mankind like giving the benefit of the doubt, but we also forget the seriousness of sin. We think of sin in comparison to ourselves (sinful creatures) rather than God (magnificent, holy, righteous, blameless, without error) and that distorts how we view sin. We tend not to view sin as the vile, filthy thing that it is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abigale BellMarch 15, 2021 at 6:42 PM

    Hi Braylan! Interesting post! I think you made a good point when you spoke of the difference between man's thoughts and God's thoughts. The hell of Dante's 'Inferno' is a watered down, humanized adaptation of the real thing. Not only is this a humanized version of hell, but a humanized version of God. To teach that God will give you a lesser punishment in hell, is to teach that God is not as severe in dealing with sin as He says and that He is, in essence, a liar.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more