Skip to main content

Man's logic vs God's logic // Braylan Stringfellow

    It goes without saying that hell in the Bible is nothing like hell in The Inferno. In the Bible, hell is the same for everyone there no matter what someone did on earth. But in The Inferno, hell is divided up in what I look as different punishments for different things, similar to how there is different punishments for crimes in today's judicial system. The one I find most interesting is circle I. 

    Circle I is where the virtuous pagans go along with those who were not baptized. Circle I is the least severe level of hell. What I find interesting is the reason as to why virtuous pagans get the least severe punishment. Dante said, "The signature of honor they left on earth is recognized in Heaven and wins them ease in Hell out of God's favor" (Dante 29). It is almost like works-based salvation, but instead of heaven you get "easy hell." Also, the reason they get to go here is because they did not know about God. So now its like a "you didn't know any better so we will go easy on you" kind of logic. 

    This shows me the huge difference between the way man thinks and God thinks. Man likes to give the benefit of the doubt and to show a lot of mercy and grace to a fault. Man likes to justify his own doings by saying like "I didn't know any better." Whereas God has all sin on an even playing field, and says in Romans 1:20, "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen...so that they are without excuse."


I commented on Abigale Bell's and Haley Riddle's post

Comments

  1. Emmett BryantMarch 15, 2021 at 5:38 PM

    Hey Braylan,
    I really like how you described Circle I as "easy hell." Going off of what you said, not only does mankind like giving the benefit of the doubt, but we also forget the seriousness of sin. We think of sin in comparison to ourselves (sinful creatures) rather than God (magnificent, holy, righteous, blameless, without error) and that distorts how we view sin. We tend not to view sin as the vile, filthy thing that it is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abigale BellMarch 15, 2021 at 6:42 PM

    Hi Braylan! Interesting post! I think you made a good point when you spoke of the difference between man's thoughts and God's thoughts. The hell of Dante's 'Inferno' is a watered down, humanized adaptation of the real thing. Not only is this a humanized version of hell, but a humanized version of God. To teach that God will give you a lesser punishment in hell, is to teach that God is not as severe in dealing with sin as He says and that He is, in essence, a liar.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more