Skip to main content

Minding the Monsters // Ian Blair

    Ok so Dante has now included just about every major mythological story or monster that he can besides the Scylla monster and Charybdis. Multiple people have pointed out how the story includes references and callbacks to various other works that Dante no doubt was a fan of. Speaking of fandom, Dante’s love of Greek mythological stories is quite obvious from Cerberus, Charon, and many other characters being included thus far. One specific creature that Dante describes in Canto XVII intrigued me extensively, mainly because of the fact that the Spanish King that this creature is based on took a much different form in Greek stories. Geryon was depicted by the old stories as a three-headed, three-bodied giant who would lure weary travelers to his realm and then kill/rob them. Dante uses Geryon as an embodiment of fraud here, and it works well, but he takes on a more peculiar form in The Inferno that I wanted to point out in specifics. Dante’s description of the beast is quite appalling:

    “His face was innocent of every guile, benign and just in feature and expression; and under it his body was half reptile. His two great paws were hairy to the armpits; all his back and breast and both his flanks were figured with bright knots and subtle circlets… His tail twitched in the void beyond that lip, thrashing, and twisting up the envenomed form which, like a scorpion’s stinger, armed the tip.” (Canto XVII, lines 10-27). 

    In order to give a more fiendish feel to the monsters of hell, the draconic body is a fitting change, and a scorpion tail to go along with a pair of wings is not unlike a creature that fantasy setting fans may remember the name of: the Manticore. In order to have a horrifying underworld, one needs horrifying monsters inhabiting said underworld, and Dante continually puts on a clinic with how he builds his setting. I think the main question looking toward the end of the story will be the fate of lower circles of hell, and I personally can’t wait to see what other characters he will stumble across next.


I commented on...

Comments

  1. I have never been one for Greek mythology, but it is amazing to see how much Dante incorporates it into his work. It's almost exciting because we read the Inferno assuming what hell is going to be like and then we get all these surprises that give us nostalgia of the Greeks. I am not sure if hell would be more or less terrifying with or without the Greek monsters. I suppose I won't have to find out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think its fascinating that he makes his creature kind of take on pieces of the leopard and lion. The gaudily-spotted suggest the leopard and the hairy paws the Lion. I love the use of the human face because it symbolizes the human nature of Fraud. I love his use of Greek monsters.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...