Skip to main content

The Grieving Woman- Caroline Tucker

 I enjoyed reading Beowulf and discussing the text in class. There are several interesting questions and thoughts that come from reading an awesome work of poetry like this one. While reading, I noticed a few random things that I do not necessarily understand why they are in the text. They seem to be added in randomly with little to no point. If they are in the text, they must be of some importance. However, I do not understand the importance. 

The main time I saw this was near the end of the text where it says, “A Geat woman to sing out and grief; /  with hair bound up, she unburden herself / with her worst fears, a wild litany / of nightmare and lament: her nation invited, enemies on the rampage, bodies in piles, slavery and abasement” (3150-3155). This quote is after Beowulf has died and they have had his funeral. I was surprised to see this quote. It seems random. The author does not express who this woman is in specifics, only that she is a Geat. Initially, I did not understand why it was included. It did not make sense to randomly mention someone grieving. But, what pushed my curiosity further was the fact that it is a woman. Why did the author put a woman as the figure of grief in this section of the text? Why an individual woman instead of a group of people? Why do you think the author put this section in?


P.s. I commented on Jamie’s and Braylan’s posts.

Comments

  1. Emmett BryantMarch 1, 2021 at 4:42 PM

    When I read it, I imagined that it was the mother or relative of someone who had lost someone they loved. I also figured the author probably portrayed a woman this way is because men tend to hide their feelings because of a sense of "manliness." That woman was expressing how many actually felt I think.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haylee LyndMarch 1, 2021 at 7:56 PM

    I think by giving the detail that she is a women, one can see that she was not close to Beowulf in terms of being either his relative or a close soldier. She was an ordinary citizen who understood that the loss of her king could mean the loss of her whole nation and way of life. The death of their leader was an invitation to other nations to attack. She expresses what I believe everyone is fearing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...
3 comments
Read more