Skip to main content

Thoughts on Canto V~ Logan Turner

 Once again, this post is not going to be particularly profound, but rather an observation that I made while reading Inferno.

One thing that I found to be particularly interesting was the plight of Francesca. She was forced to be in the second circle of Hell after she kissed her husband's younger brother while reading the tale of Lancelot and Guinevere. Of all the things she had to be sent to Hell for, she got sent to Hell for kissing someone? They didn't even consummate the relationship in the 'traditional' way, but yet she still got sent to Hell? I just think that is quite extreme given how minor the act was compared to others she could have committed.

I also find it to be sort of ironic because we often idealize the sort of love stories like the one she was reading, but she got swept up into it and got sent to Hell as a result. In all honesty, the whole time I was reading this I had the image of a high school student comparing their relationship to Romeo and Juliet's. Like the students, she never quite understood the meaning behind the story that they were reading. I guess that is a loose connection, though.

Anyway, those are some barely coherent thoughts I had while reading Inferno.

Edit: Commented on Haylee Lynd's and Caroline Tucker's posts

Comments

  1. Ian BlairMarch 16, 2021 at 7:12 AM

    I think the problem with relationships like Francesca had romanticized is that they just simply never work out. At least, not in the way that one typically hopes a relationship will work out. Having the emotional maturity to understand when a relationship is not working right was not usually found in people at the age that some would marry, which would cause tension between houses of families simply because the parents of the couple tried to rush something that wasn't ready to happen yet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jackson RiddleMarch 16, 2021 at 9:27 AM

    I think part of the reasoning behind Francesca being sent to Hell was that not only did she let her lust consume her, she betrayed her husband and broke the loyalty she had with him through marriage. Also, I agree, it's almost comical to see teenagers compare their love for each other to such extreme examples such as Romeo and Juliet, when in reality what they think is love comes nowhere close to the extremities of Romeo and Juliet's situation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more