Skip to main content

What’s your Bias? ~ Madalyn Dillard

     Reading Dante’s Inferno has been a whirlwind of biases. At first, I was mad since people who were in Hell were there purely based off of what Dante thought of the characters. Sure, some of the people featured in Hell had reasons to corroborate their place, but others are there for reasons that are simply ludicrous. For example, Helen, most commonly known from Homer’s Iliad, was in the position of the third circle, Lust. If I remember correctly, Helen probably did not have a say as to who kidnapped her and used her body for pleasure which would fit the era that the famous story took place. 

    As I was writing the sentence right above what you are reading now, I thought of what the story would be like if Dante did not write with a bias, and I imagine that it would be very boring. Hell would be practically empty without biases. If you were Dante in modern era, who would be the people in your version of the Inferno? Of course, most people will say something like, “Evil people like Hitler or Charles Manson would surely be in Hell.” However, this is also a little biased. So, my initial hatred of Dante’s biased approach has changed. Even though I still disagree with some choices Dante made (Helen), I, now, read with a little more clarity. 


I commented on Brooke and Rachael’s posts. 

Comments

  1. Rachael GregsonMarch 15, 2021 at 4:55 PM

    I agree with you. This is why we should leave all the judgment to God, because God is far from being bias. Dante basically threw anyone he wanted into hell, and I guess being the writer, he had every freedom to do so to world build. But some of the people there didn't deserve to be there, and I found it quite odd (unlike they did something we don't know about).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Caroline TuckerMarch 15, 2021 at 7:20 PM

    I agree! I was shocked that Dante put Dido into hell and specifically in the circle of hell that included lust and love. She did not choose to love or even lust, if she did. She was in love with Aeneas because the gods put a “spell” on her. She did not choose to love him and she killed herself because of beer love. So, is she in hell because she did not choose love or because she killed herself out of her love?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Haylee LyndMarch 15, 2021 at 9:48 PM

    I find it fascinating that you say "in Hell." I think all except those who accept Christ as their savior deserve to be in Hell, and I think Dante writes it that way, even putting Virgil rightly into it. He does, however, seem a little biased against the women. I will say that Virgil, from whom Dante derives inspiration, also puts Dido in Hell.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...
4 comments
Read more

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more