Skip to main content

What’s your Bias? ~ Madalyn Dillard

     Reading Dante’s Inferno has been a whirlwind of biases. At first, I was mad since people who were in Hell were there purely based off of what Dante thought of the characters. Sure, some of the people featured in Hell had reasons to corroborate their place, but others are there for reasons that are simply ludicrous. For example, Helen, most commonly known from Homer’s Iliad, was in the position of the third circle, Lust. If I remember correctly, Helen probably did not have a say as to who kidnapped her and used her body for pleasure which would fit the era that the famous story took place. 

    As I was writing the sentence right above what you are reading now, I thought of what the story would be like if Dante did not write with a bias, and I imagine that it would be very boring. Hell would be practically empty without biases. If you were Dante in modern era, who would be the people in your version of the Inferno? Of course, most people will say something like, “Evil people like Hitler or Charles Manson would surely be in Hell.” However, this is also a little biased. So, my initial hatred of Dante’s biased approach has changed. Even though I still disagree with some choices Dante made (Helen), I, now, read with a little more clarity. 


I commented on Brooke and Rachael’s posts. 

Comments

  1. Rachael GregsonMarch 15, 2021 at 4:55 PM

    I agree with you. This is why we should leave all the judgment to God, because God is far from being bias. Dante basically threw anyone he wanted into hell, and I guess being the writer, he had every freedom to do so to world build. But some of the people there didn't deserve to be there, and I found it quite odd (unlike they did something we don't know about).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Caroline TuckerMarch 15, 2021 at 7:20 PM

    I agree! I was shocked that Dante put Dido into hell and specifically in the circle of hell that included lust and love. She did not choose to love or even lust, if she did. She was in love with Aeneas because the gods put a “spell” on her. She did not choose to love him and she killed herself because of beer love. So, is she in hell because she did not choose love or because she killed herself out of her love?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Haylee LyndMarch 15, 2021 at 9:48 PM

    I find it fascinating that you say "in Hell." I think all except those who accept Christ as their savior deserve to be in Hell, and I think Dante writes it that way, even putting Virgil rightly into it. He does, however, seem a little biased against the women. I will say that Virgil, from whom Dante derives inspiration, also puts Dido in Hell.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more