Skip to main content

What’s your Bias? ~ Madalyn Dillard

     Reading Dante’s Inferno has been a whirlwind of biases. At first, I was mad since people who were in Hell were there purely based off of what Dante thought of the characters. Sure, some of the people featured in Hell had reasons to corroborate their place, but others are there for reasons that are simply ludicrous. For example, Helen, most commonly known from Homer’s Iliad, was in the position of the third circle, Lust. If I remember correctly, Helen probably did not have a say as to who kidnapped her and used her body for pleasure which would fit the era that the famous story took place. 

    As I was writing the sentence right above what you are reading now, I thought of what the story would be like if Dante did not write with a bias, and I imagine that it would be very boring. Hell would be practically empty without biases. If you were Dante in modern era, who would be the people in your version of the Inferno? Of course, most people will say something like, “Evil people like Hitler or Charles Manson would surely be in Hell.” However, this is also a little biased. So, my initial hatred of Dante’s biased approach has changed. Even though I still disagree with some choices Dante made (Helen), I, now, read with a little more clarity. 


I commented on Brooke and Rachael’s posts. 

Comments

  1. Rachael GregsonMarch 15, 2021 at 4:55 PM

    I agree with you. This is why we should leave all the judgment to God, because God is far from being bias. Dante basically threw anyone he wanted into hell, and I guess being the writer, he had every freedom to do so to world build. But some of the people there didn't deserve to be there, and I found it quite odd (unlike they did something we don't know about).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Caroline TuckerMarch 15, 2021 at 7:20 PM

    I agree! I was shocked that Dante put Dido into hell and specifically in the circle of hell that included lust and love. She did not choose to love or even lust, if she did. She was in love with Aeneas because the gods put a “spell” on her. She did not choose to love him and she killed herself because of beer love. So, is she in hell because she did not choose love or because she killed herself out of her love?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Haylee LyndMarch 15, 2021 at 9:48 PM

    I find it fascinating that you say "in Hell." I think all except those who accept Christ as their savior deserve to be in Hell, and I think Dante writes it that way, even putting Virgil rightly into it. He does, however, seem a little biased against the women. I will say that Virgil, from whom Dante derives inspiration, also puts Dido in Hell.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more